Suppr超能文献

肺弥散功能与有氧能力:二者是否有关?肥胖是否重要?

Pulmonary diffusion and aerobic capacity: is there a relation? Does obesity matter?

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Saint Mary's Health Center, Saint Louis University, MO 63117, USA.

出版信息

Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2010 Apr;198(4):499-507. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2009.02059.x. Epub 2009 Nov 13.

Abstract

AIM

We sought to determine whether pulmonary diffusing capacity for nitric oxide (DLNO), carbon monoxide (DLCO) and pulmonary capillary blood volume (Vc) at rest predict peak aerobic capacity (VO2peak), and if so, to discern which measure predicts better.

METHODS

Thirty-five individuals with extreme obesity (body mass index or BMI = 50 +/- 8 kg m((-2)) and 26 fit, non-obese subjects (BMI = 23 +/- 2 kg m((-2)) participated. DLNO and DLCO at rest were first measured. Then, subjects performed a graded exercise test on a cycle ergometer to determine (VO2peak). Multivariate regression was used to assess relations in the data.

RESULTS

Findings indicate that (i) pulmonary diffusion at rest predicts (VO2peak) in the fit and obese when measured with DLNO, but only in the fit when measured with DLCO; (ii) the observed relation between pulmonary diffusion at rest and (VO2peak) is different in the fit and obese; (iii) DLNO explains (VO2peak) better than DLCO or Vc. The findings imply the following reference equations for DLNO: (VO2peak) (mL kg(-1) min(-1)) = 6.81 + 0.27 x DLNO for fit individuals; (VO2peak) (mL kg(-1) min(-1)) = 6.81 + 0.06 x DLNO, for obese individuals (in both groups, adjusted R(2 )=( )0.92; RMSE = 5.58).

CONCLUSION

Pulmonary diffusion at rest predicts (VO2peak), although a relation exists for obese subjects only when DLNO is used, and the magnitude of the relation depends on gender when either DLCO or Vc is used. We recommend DLNO as a measure of pulmonary diffusion, both for its ease of collection as well as its tighter relation with (VO2peak).

摘要

目的

我们旨在确定一氧化氮(DLNO)、一氧化碳(DLCO)和肺毛细血管血容量(Vc)在静息状态下的肺弥散能力是否可以预测峰值有氧能力(VO2peak),如果可以,那么哪种测量方法的预测效果更好。

方法

35 名极度肥胖者(体重指数或 BMI = 50 +/- 8 kg m(-2)) 和 26 名健康、非肥胖者(BMI = 23 +/- 2 kg m(-2)) 参与了本研究。首先测量静息状态下的 DLNO 和 DLCO。然后,受试者在自行车测力计上进行分级运动测试以确定 VO2peak。使用多元回归分析来评估数据中的关系。

结果

研究结果表明:(i)在健康和肥胖人群中,静息状态下的肺弥散能力可以通过 DLNO 预测 VO2peak,但仅在健康人群中可以通过 DLCO 进行预测;(ii)在健康和肥胖人群中,静息状态下的肺弥散能力与 VO2peak 之间的观察到的关系是不同的;(iii)DLNO 比 DLCO 或 Vc 能更好地解释 VO2peak。研究结果表明,对于 DLNO,得出以下参考方程:健康个体的 VO2peak(mL kg(-1) min(-1)) = 6.81 + 0.27 x DLNO;肥胖个体的 VO2peak(mL kg(-1) min(-1)) = 6.81 + 0.06 x DLNO(在两组中,调整后的 R(2)=( )0.92;RMSE = 5.58)。

结论

静息状态下的肺弥散能力可以预测 VO2peak,但只有在使用 DLNO 时肥胖者才存在这种关系,并且当使用 DLCO 或 Vc 时,这种关系的大小取决于性别。我们建议使用 DLNO 作为肺弥散的测量方法,这不仅是因为它易于收集,而且还因为它与 VO2peak 的关系更紧密。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验