University of Edinburgh, Centre for Inflammation Research and Centre for Multiple Sclerosis Research, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK.
Clin Exp Immunol. 2010 Feb;159(2):137-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2009.04040.x. Epub 2009 Nov 11.
CD4(+) T cells display considerable flexibility in their effector functions, allowing them to tackle most effectively the range of pathogenic infections with which we are challenged. The classical T helper (Th) 1 and Th2 subsets have been joined recently by the Th17 lineage. If not controlled, the potent effector functions (chiefly cytokine production) of which these different cells are capable can lead to (sometimes fatal) autoimmune and allergic inflammation. The primary cell population tasked with providing this control appears to be CD4(+) regulatory T (T(reg)) cells expressing the forkhead box P3 (FoxP3) transcription factor. Here we consider the comparative capacity of FoxP3(+) T(regs) to influence the polarization, expansion and effector function of Th1, Th2 and Th17 cells in vitro and in vivo as well as in relation to human disease. This remains a particularly challenging series of interactions to understand, especially given our evolving understanding of T(reg) and T effector interrelationships, as well as recent insights into functional plasticity that cast doubt upon the wisdom of a strict categorization of T effector cells based on cytokine production.
CD4(+) T 细胞在其效应功能上表现出相当大的灵活性,使它们能够最有效地应对我们所面临的各种病原体感染。最近,经典的辅助性 T 细胞(Th)1 和 Th2 亚群又加入了 Th17 谱系。如果这些不同细胞的强大效应功能(主要是细胞因子产生)得不到控制,就可能导致(有时是致命的)自身免疫和过敏炎症。负责提供这种控制的主要细胞群体似乎是表达叉头框 P3(FoxP3)转录因子的 CD4(+)调节性 T(Treg)细胞。在这里,我们考虑 FoxP3(+)Treg 细胞在体外和体内以及与人类疾病相关的情况下,影响 Th1、Th2 和 Th17 细胞的极化、扩增和效应功能的比较能力。这仍然是一个特别具有挑战性的相互作用系列,尤其是考虑到我们对 Treg 和 T 效应细胞相互关系的不断发展的理解,以及最近对功能可塑性的深入了解,这些都对基于细胞因子产生来对 T 效应细胞进行严格分类的智慧提出了质疑。