• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直肠癌手术后吻合口漏:局部复发、远处转移和降低癌症特异性生存的危险因素?

Anastomotic leakage after surgery for rectal cancer: a risk factor for local recurrence, distant metastasis and reduced cancer-specific survival?

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Helsingborg Hospital, Lund University, Helsingborg, Sweden.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2011 Mar;13(3):272-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02136.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02136.x
PMID:19912285
Abstract

AIM

The impact of anastomic leakage (AL) on the oncological outcome after anterior resection (AR) for rectal cancer is still controversial. We explored the impact of AL regarding local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis and overall recurrence (OAR). Overall and cancer-specific survival was analysed.

METHOD

Patients undergoing AR for rectal cancer with a registered AL between 1995 and 1997 and a control group were identified in the Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry. The medical records were retrieved for additional data and validation. Differences in the oncological outcome at 5-year follow-up were analysed with multivariate methods.

RESULTS

After validation, 114 patients with AL and 136 control patients with locally radical surgery for tumours in tumour-node-metastasis stages I-III were analysed. There was no difference detected between patients with AL and control patients regarding rates of LR [8% (9 of 114) vs 9% (12 of 136); P = 0.97], distant metastasis [18% (20 of 114) vs 23% (31 of 136); P = 0.37] and OAR [19% (22 of 114) vs 28% (38 of 136); P = 0.15]. The 5-year cancer-specific survival was almost 80% in both groups. In multivariate analysis, AL was not a risk factor of LR, distant metastasis or OAR and had no impact on 5-year overall or 5-year cancer-specific survival. Irrespective of the occurrence of AL, preoperative radiotherapy (P = 0.055) and rectal washout (P = 0.046) reduced the LR rate, but did not influence survival.

CONCLUSION

Anastomotic leakage was not proved to be a risk factor of worse oncological outcome. Hence, additional adjuvant treatment or extended follow-up on the basis of the occurrence of AL after AR might not be justified.

摘要

目的

吻合口漏(AL)对直肠癌前切除术(AR)后肿瘤学结果的影响仍存在争议。我们探讨了 AL 对局部复发(LR)、远处转移和总体复发(OAR)的影响。分析了总生存率和癌症特异性生存率。

方法

在瑞典直肠癌登记处,确定了 1995 年至 1997 年间接受 AR 治疗且有吻合口漏记录的患者,以及接受局部根治性手术治疗肿瘤处于肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期 I-III 期的对照组患者。对 5 年随访时的肿瘤学结果进行了多变量分析。

结果

经验证后,共分析了 114 例 AL 患者和 136 例局部根治性手术治疗肿瘤处于肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期 I-III 期的对照组患者。AL 组和对照组的 LR 发生率[8%(9/114)与 9%(12/136);P = 0.97]、远处转移率[18%(20/114)与 23%(31/136);P = 0.37]和 OAR 发生率[19%(22/114)与 28%(38/136);P = 0.15]无差异。两组的 5 年癌症特异性生存率均接近 80%。多变量分析显示,AL 不是 LR、远处转移或 OAR 的危险因素,也不影响 5 年总生存率和 5 年癌症特异性生存率。无论是否发生 AL,术前放疗(P = 0.055)和直肠冲洗(P = 0.046)均可降低 LR 发生率,但不影响生存率。

结论

吻合口漏未被证实是肿瘤学结果恶化的危险因素。因此,AR 后发生 AL 时,没有理由进行额外的辅助治疗或延长随访。

相似文献

1
Anastomotic leakage after surgery for rectal cancer: a risk factor for local recurrence, distant metastasis and reduced cancer-specific survival?直肠癌手术后吻合口漏:局部复发、远处转移和降低癌症特异性生存的危险因素?
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Mar;13(3):272-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02136.x.
2
Long-term outcome of anastomosis leakage after curative resection for mid and low rectal cancer.中低位直肠癌根治性切除术后吻合口漏的长期结局
Hepatogastroenterology. 2003 Nov-Dec;50(54):1898-902.
3
Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection for rectal cancer: short and long-term outcome.直肠癌根治性前切除术后吻合口漏:短期和长期结果。
Colorectal Dis. 2010 Jul;12(7 Online):e76-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01935.x. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
4
Anastomotic leakage: a disaster or a challenge with an impact on survival after rectal cancer surgery?吻合口漏:是一场灾难还是对直肠癌手术后生存产生影响的一项挑战?
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Mar;13(3):237-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02563.x.
5
Intra-operative perforation is an important predictor of local recurrence and impaired survival after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer.术中穿孔是直肠癌经腹会阴切除术后局部复发和生存受损的一个重要预测指标。
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Nov;13(11):1256-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02459.x.
6
Oncological outcome of ultra-low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the lower third of the rectum: Comparison of intrapelvic double-stapled anastomosis and transanal coloanal anastomosis.直肠下三分之一癌行超低位前切除术加全直肠系膜切除术的肿瘤学结局:盆腔内双吻合器吻合与经肛门结肠肛管吻合的比较。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2005 Nov-Dec;52(66):1692-7.
7
[Total excision of the mesorectum in cancer of the lower and middle rectum. Oncological and functional results].[中低位直肠癌的直肠系膜全切除。肿瘤学及功能学结果]
Chirurg. 2003 Feb;74(2):125-31. doi: 10.1007/s00104-002-0558-6.
8
Local recurrence after mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.直肠癌直肠系膜切除术后的局部复发
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2002 Mar;28(2):126-34. doi: 10.1053/ejso.2001.1231.
9
Active lymphangiogenesis is a major risk factor for anastomotic leakage following sphincter-sparing resection of rectal cancer.活跃的淋巴管生成是直肠癌保肛手术后吻合口漏的一个主要危险因素。
J Surg Oncol. 2011 Oct;104(5):493-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.21965. Epub 2011 Apr 25.
10
Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery.直肠癌手术后吻合口漏的肿瘤学及生存结局的多中心分析
Br J Surg. 2009 Sep;96(9):1066-75. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6694.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leak in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Rectal Cancer Resection: A Retrospective Analysis.直肠癌切除手术患者吻合口漏的危险因素:一项回顾性分析
Cureus. 2025 Feb 25;17(2):e79647. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79647. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Risk of anastomotic leakage with two-row versus three-row manual circular staplers in colorectal anastomosis: a U.S. cohort study.两排与三排手动圆形吻合器在结直肠吻合术中吻合口漏的风险:一项美国队列研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Nov 7;38(1):264. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04552-0.
3
Clinical analysis of anastomotic fistula after anal preservation in 358 cases of rectal cancer and construction of risk prediction model: a single-center retrospective study.
358例直肠癌保肛术后吻合口瘘的临床分析及风险预测模型构建:一项单中心回顾性研究
Am J Transl Res. 2023 Jun 15;15(6):4390-4398. eCollection 2023.
4
Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term prognosis after colorectal cancer surgery.吻合口漏对结直肠癌手术后长期预后的影响。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 May 27;15(5):745-756. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i5.745.
5
Oncological outcomes of rectal cancer patients with anastomotic leakage: A multicenter case-control study.吻合口漏的直肠癌患者的肿瘤学结局:一项多中心病例对照研究。
Front Surg. 2022 Sep 12;9:993650. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.993650. eCollection 2022.
6
The impact of anastomotic leakage on oncology after curative anterior resection for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.直肠癌根治性前切除术后吻合口漏对肿瘤学的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Sep 11;99(37):e22139. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022139.
7
Meta-analysis of the impact of postoperative infective complications on oncological outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery.Meta 分析结直肠癌手术后感染性并发症对肿瘤学结局的影响。
BJS Open. 2020 Oct;4(5):737-747. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50302. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
8
Rare Abdominal Wall Metastasis following Curative Resection of Gastric Cancer: What Can Be Learned from the Use of Percutaneous Catheters?胃癌根治性切除术后罕见的腹壁转移:经皮导管的应用能带来哪些启示?
Case Rep Oncol Med. 2020 May 9;2020:3738798. doi: 10.1155/2020/3738798. eCollection 2020.
9
Costs Analysis of Fibrin Sealant for Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage in Lower Colorectal Surgery.纤维蛋白封闭剂预防低位结直肠手术吻合口漏的成本分析
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 Jan 13;13:5-11. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S221008. eCollection 2020.
10
Prognostic impact of postoperative intra-abdominal infections after elective colorectal cancer resection on survival and local recurrence: a propensity score-matched analysis.择期结直肠癌切除术后腹腔内感染对生存和局部复发的预后影响:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Mar;35(3):413-422. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03493-x. Epub 2020 Jan 2.