• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜治疗复发性克罗恩病:其疗效与原发性克罗恩病相比如何?

Laparoscopy for recurrent Crohn's disease: how do the results compare with the results for primary Crohn's disease?

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida 33331, USA.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2011 Mar;13(3):302-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02133.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02133.x
PMID:19912288
Abstract

AIM

To assess the feasibility and outcomes of reoperative laparoscopic-assisted surgery for recurrent Crohn's disease compared with index laparoscopic resections.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed from 2001 to 2008 on patients who had primary laparoscopy (group I) or reoperative laparoscopy for Crohn's disease (group II). Data collection included demographic and surgical data, and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty patients were included in this study, distributed as follows: group I, 80 patients with a mean age of 35 years; and group II, 50 patients with a mean age of 42 years. Preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists score and body mass index were similar in both groups. Patients in group II had a longer period of disease (15.5 vs 8.9 years in groups I and II, respectively; P = 0.0002). Immunosuppressive therapy had been utilized in 66 (82.5%) and in 42 (84%) patients in groups I and II, respectively. Ileocolic resection was the most commonly performed procedure in both groups (82%), followed by subtotal colectomy. Conversion rates were 18.7 and 32% in groups I and II, respectively (P = 0.09). The mean operative time (182 vs 201 min) and mean blood loss (161 vs 202 ml) were not significantly different (P > 0.05); however, the overall incisional length was significantly longer in group II (6.7 vs 11.4 cm, P = 0.045). A stoma was created in 17 and 16% of patients in groups I and II, respectively. Overall, early postoperative complications were not statistically significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05); anastomotic leak occurred in four (5%) and one (2%) patients (P = 0.65), and abdominal abscess in three (3.75%) and four (8%) patients (P = 0.56), in groups I and II, respectively. Reoperative rates were 10 and 6% (P = 0.53), and mean hospital stay was similar in groups I and II respectively (6.7 vs 7.5 days, respectively; P = 0.3266). There was no mortality.

CONCLUSION

The results of laparoscopic-assisted resection for recurrent Crohn's disease are similar to those for primary resection.

摘要

目的

评估与初次腹腔镜切除术相比,对复发性克罗恩病进行再次腹腔镜辅助手术的可行性和结果。

方法

对 2001 年至 2008 年期间行初次腹腔镜(I 组)或复发性腹腔镜(II 组)治疗的克罗恩病患者的前瞻性数据库进行回顾性分析。数据收集包括人口统计学和手术数据以及术后结果。

结果

本研究共纳入 130 例患者,分布如下:I 组 80 例,平均年龄 35 岁;II 组 50 例,平均年龄 42 岁。两组患者的术前美国麻醉医师协会评分和体重指数相似。II 组患者的疾病病程较长(I 组和 II 组分别为 15.5 年和 8.9 年;P = 0.0002)。66 例(82.5%)和 42 例(84%)I 组和 II 组患者分别接受了免疫抑制治疗。两组最常见的手术方式均为回肠结肠切除术(82%),其次是次全结肠切除术。I 组和 II 组的转化率分别为 18.7%和 32%(P = 0.09)。手术时间(182 分钟比 201 分钟)和术中出血量(161 毫升比 202 毫升)无显著差异(P > 0.05);但 II 组的总切口长度明显更长(6.7 厘米比 11.4 厘米,P = 0.045)。I 组和 II 组分别有 17%和 16%的患者造口。总体而言,两组患者的早期术后并发症无统计学差异(P > 0.05);吻合口漏分别发生在 4 例(5%)和 1 例(2%)患者(P = 0.65),腹部脓肿分别发生在 3 例(3.75%)和 4 例(8%)患者(P = 0.56),I 组和 II 组。再次手术率分别为 10%和 6%(P = 0.53),I 组和 II 组的平均住院时间分别为 6.7 天和 7.5 天(P = 0.3266)。无死亡病例。

结论

腹腔镜辅助切除复发性克罗恩病的结果与初次切除相似。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopy for recurrent Crohn's disease: how do the results compare with the results for primary Crohn's disease?腹腔镜治疗复发性克罗恩病:其疗效与原发性克罗恩病相比如何?
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Mar;13(3):302-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02133.x.
2
Laparoscopic intracorporeal ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease: is it safe?腹腔镜体内回结肠切除术治疗克罗恩病:安全吗?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Apr;52(4):651-6. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819ed620.
3
Positive histological inflammatory margins are associated with increased risk for intra-abdominal septic complications in patients undergoing ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease.阳性组织学炎症切缘与克罗恩病患者接受回肠结肠切除术时发生腹腔内感染性并发症的风险增加相关。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Nov;55(11):1125-30. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318267c74c.
4
Short-term complications of wide-lumen stapled anastomosis after ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease: who is at risk?克罗恩病回肠结肠切除术后使用大口径吻合器吻合的短期并发症:风险因素有哪些?
Colorectal Dis. 2010 Oct;12(10 Online):e298-303. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02180.x.
5
Impact of complex Crohn's disease on the outcome of laparoscopic ileocecal resection: a comparative clinical study in 124 patients.复杂性克罗恩病对腹腔镜回盲部切除术预后的影响:124例患者的比较临床研究
Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Feb;52(2):205-10. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819c9c08.
6
[Laparoscopy-assisted ileocolic resection in Crohn's disease].[腹腔镜辅助下克罗恩病的回结肠切除术]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2010 Aug 23;172(34):2288-91.
7
Repeat intestinal resections increase the risk of recurrence of Crohn's disease.重复肠道切除术会增加克罗恩病复发的风险。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Jul;56(7):881-7. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31828cb80c.
8
Laparoscopic surgery for recurrent ileocolic Crohn's disease is as safe and effective as primary resection.腹腔镜手术治疗复发性回肠末端克罗恩病与初次手术同样安全有效。
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Dec;13(12):1413-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02511.x.
9
[Role of anastomotic configuration in ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease].[吻合口形态在克罗恩病回结肠切除术中的作用]
Chir Ital. 2009 Jan-Feb;61(1):23-31.
10
Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease: follow-up of a prospective randomized trial.克罗恩病腹腔镜与开腹回结肠切除术的长期疗效:一项前瞻性随机试验的随访
Surgery. 2008 Oct;144(4):622-7; discussion 627-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.06.016.

引用本文的文献

1
Perioperative optimization of Crohn's disease.克罗恩病的围手术期优化
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2022 Oct 13;7(1):10-26. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12621. eCollection 2023 Jan.
2
The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic redo surgery for recurrent Crohn's disease: A comparative clinical study of over 100 consecutive patients.腹腔镜再次手术治疗复发性克罗恩病的安全性和可行性:100余例连续患者的比较临床研究
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021 Dec 16;6(3):405-411. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12534. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Repeated surgery for recurrent Crohn's disease: does the outcome keep worsening operation after operation? A comparative study of 1224 consecutive procedures.
重复手术治疗复发性克罗恩病:手术次数增加是否会导致结局恶化?一项 1224 例连续手术的对比研究。
Updates Surg. 2022 Feb;74(1):73-80. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01187-0. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
4
The role of laparoscopic surgery in repeat ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease.腹腔镜手术在克罗恩病复发回肠结肠切除术中的作用。
Colorectal Dis. 2021 Aug;23(8):2075-2084. doi: 10.1111/codi.15675. Epub 2021 May 24.
5
IS LAPAROSCOPIC REOPERATION FEASIBLE TO TREAT EARLY COMPLICATIONS AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC COLORECTAL RESECTIONS?腹腔镜再次手术治疗腹腔镜结直肠切除术后早期并发症是否可行?
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2020 Jul 8;33(1):e1502. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020190001e1502.
6
When should we add a diverting loop ileostomy to laparoscopic ileocolic resection for primary Crohn's disease?对于原发性克罗恩病的腹腔镜回肠结肠切除术,我们应在何时添加预防性回肠造口术?
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jun;35(6):2543-2557. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07670-w. Epub 2020 May 28.
7
Minimally Invasive Surgery in Complex Crohn's Disease.复杂克罗恩病的微创手术
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019 Jul;32(4):300-304. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683922. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
8
Preliminary study of short- and long-term outcome and quality of life after minimally invasive surgery for Crohn's disease: Comparison between single incision, robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopy.克罗恩病微创手术后短期和长期结局及生活质量的初步研究:单切口、机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜手术的比较
J Minim Access Surg. 2020 Oct-Dec;16(4):364-371. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_61_19.
9
Laparoscopic redo surgery in recurrent ileocolic Crohn's disease: A standardised technique.复发性回结肠型克罗恩病的腹腔镜再次手术:一种标准化技术。
J Minim Access Surg. 2020 Jan-Mar;16(1):90-93. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_144_18.
10
Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Reoperative Abdomen or Pelvis.微创手术在再次手术的腹部或骨盆中的作用。
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016 Jun;29(2):168-180. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1580637.