• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Rural-urban differences in stage at diagnosis. Possible relationship to cancer screening.

作者信息

Liff J M, Chow W H, Greenberg R S

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology, Emory University School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia 30329.

出版信息

Cancer. 1991 Mar 1;67(5):1454-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910301)67:5<1454::aid-cncr2820670533>3.0.co;2-k.

DOI:10.1002/1097-0142(19910301)67:5<1454::aid-cncr2820670533>3.0.co;2-k
PMID:1991313
Abstract

Stage at diagnosis was examined for various malignancies identifiable through screening to determine whether rural-urban differences exist in Georgia. Data were obtained from a population-based cancer registry which registers all incident cancers among residents of metropolitan Atlanta and ten neighboring rural counties. Black and white patients with a first primary invasive malignancy newly diagnosed between 1978 and 1985 were included in this study. Residents of the rural area were twice as likely to have unstaged cancers (18.3%) as were urban residents (9.6%). Among patients with known stage at diagnosis, rural patients tended to have more advanced disease than urban patients. The relative excess of nonlocalized malignancies in rural Georgia was 21% for whites and 37% for blacks. The rural excess of nonlocalized prostate cancer among blacks was especially pronounced. Differences in access to or utilization of early detection methods may contribute to the rural-urban differential in the extent of disease at diagnosis.

摘要

相似文献

1
Rural-urban differences in stage at diagnosis. Possible relationship to cancer screening.
Cancer. 1991 Mar 1;67(5):1454-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910301)67:5<1454::aid-cncr2820670533>3.0.co;2-k.
2
Rural-Urban Disparities in Stage of Diagnosis Among Cancers With Preventive Opportunities.具有预防机会的癌症诊断阶段的城乡差异。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 May;54(5):688-698. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.01.021. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
3
Cancer incidence rates among blacks in urban and rural Georgia, 1978-82.1978 - 1982年佐治亚州城乡黑人的癌症发病率
Am J Public Health. 1985 Jun;75(6):683-4. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.6.683.
4
Differences in late-stage diagnosis, treatment, and colorectal cancer-related death between rural and urban African Americans and whites in Georgia.佐治亚州农村和城市非裔美国人和白人在晚期诊断、治疗和结直肠癌相关死亡方面的差异。
J Rural Health. 2012 Summer;28(3):296-305. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2011.00390.x. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
5
Cancer in rural versus urban populations: a review.农村与城市人口中的癌症:综述
J Rural Health. 1992 Summer;8(3):212-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.1992.tb00354.x.
6
Health status of urban American Indians and Alaska Natives. A population-based study.美国城市印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民的健康状况。一项基于人群的研究。
JAMA. 1994 Mar 16;271(11):845-50.
7
Investigating the role of county-level colorectal cancer screening rates on stage at diagnosis of colorectal cancer in rural Georgia.调查佐治亚州农村地区县级结直肠癌筛查率对结直肠癌诊断分期的影响。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Aug;35(8):1123-1131. doi: 10.1007/s10552-024-01874-4. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
8
Racial disparities in the incidence of lung cancer: the Savannah River Region Health Information System cancer registry, 1991-95.肺癌发病率的种族差异:萨凡纳河地区健康信息系统癌症登记处,1991 - 1995年
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2003 Feb;14(1):23-33.
9
Disparities in late stage diagnosis, treatment, and breast cancer-related death by race, age, and rural residence among women in Georgia.佐治亚州女性在晚期诊断、治疗以及与乳腺癌相关的死亡方面存在的种族、年龄和农村居住情况差异。
Women Health. 2012;52(4):317-35. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2012.674091.
10
Rural-urban disparities in the management and health issues of chronic diseases in Quebec (Canada) in the early 2000s.21世纪初加拿大魁北克慢性病管理与健康问题中的城乡差异。
Rural Remote Health. 2010 Oct-Dec;10(4):1548. Epub 2010 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in and factors associated with family physician-performed screening colonoscopies in the United States: 2016-2021.2016 - 2021年美国家庭医生进行结肠镜筛查的趋势及相关因素
J Rural Health. 2025 Jan;41(1):e12858. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12858. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
2
Area-based disparities in non-small-cell lung cancer survival.基于区域的非小细胞肺癌生存差异。
Acta Oncol. 2024 Apr 9;63:146-153. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2024.27507.
3
Malignant mixed mullerian tumors: a SEER database review of rurality and treatment modalities on disease outcome.
恶性苗勒管混合瘤:基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库对农村地区情况及疾病结局治疗方式的回顾
Front Oncol. 2024 Feb 8;14:1296496. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1296496. eCollection 2024.
4
Examining the roles of travel distance, medical mistrust, and cancer fatalism in the uptake of clinical cancer prevention among women in rural and urban US communities: A secondary data analysis.探究旅行距离、医疗不信任和癌症宿命论在美国城乡社区女性临床癌症预防措施采用中的作用:一项二次数据分析。
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Jan 13;38:102611. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102611. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
Determining the association of rurality and cardiovascular disease among prostate cancer survivors.确定农村环境与前列腺癌幸存者心血管疾病的关联。
Urol Oncol. 2023 Oct;41(10):429.e15-429.e23. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.06.008. Epub 2023 Jul 16.
6
Awareness of and interaction with physician rating websites: A cross-sectional study in Austria.医生评级网站的认知度与交互作用:奥地利的一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 30;17(12):e0278510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278510. eCollection 2022.
7
The Impact of Social Influence on the Intention to Use Physician Rating Websites: Moderated Mediation Analysis Using a Mixed Methods Approach.社会影响对使用医生评价网站意愿的影响:混合方法研究的中介调节分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 14;24(11):e37505. doi: 10.2196/37505.
8
The impact of patient travel time on disparities in treatment for early stage lung cancer in California.患者交通时间对加利福尼亚州早期肺癌治疗差异的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 5;17(10):e0272076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272076. eCollection 2022.
9
Rural-Urban Disparities in Cancer Outcomes: Opportunities for Future Research.城乡癌症结局差异:未来研究的机遇。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Jul 11;114(7):940-952. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac030.
10
shinyOPTIK, a User-Friendly R Shiny Application for Visualizing Cancer Risk Factors and Mortality Across the University of Kansas Cancer Center Catchment Area.shinyOPTIK,一个用户友好的 R Shiny 应用程序,用于可视化堪萨斯大学癌症中心集水区的癌症风险因素和死亡率。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2022 Jan;6:e2100118. doi: 10.1200/CCI.21.00118.