Institute for Control and Systems Engineering, TU Dortmund, Dortmund, 44221, Germany.
Evol Comput. 2009 Winter;17(4):577-93. doi: 10.1162/evco.2009.17.4.17408.
Evolutionary algorithms perform robust search in complex and high dimensional search spaces, but require a large number of fitness evaluations to approximate optimal solutions. These characteristics limit their potential for hardware in the loop optimization and problems that require extensive simulations and calculations. Evolutionary algorithms do not maintain their knowledge about the fitness function as they only store solutions of the current generation. In contrast, model assisted evolutionary algorithms utilize the information contained in previously evaluated solutions in terms of a data based model. The convergence of the evolutionary algorithm is improved as some selection decisions rely on the model rather than to invoke expensive evaluations of the true fitness function. The novelty of our scheme stems from the preselection of solutions based on an instance based fitness model, in which the selection pressure is adjusted to the quality of model. This so-called lambda-control adapts the number of true fitness evaluations to the monitored model quality. Our method extends the previous approaches for model assisted scalar optimization to multi-objective problems by a proper redefinition of model quality and preselection pressure control. The analysis on multi-objective benchmark optimization problems not only confirms the superior convergence of the model assisted evolution strategy in comparison with a multi-objective evolution strategy but also the positive effect of regulated preselection in contrast to merely static preselection.
进化算法在复杂和高维搜索空间中进行稳健搜索,但需要大量的适应度评估来逼近最优解。这些特点限制了它们在硬件在环优化和需要广泛模拟和计算的问题中的潜力。进化算法在存储当前代的解决方案时,不会保留它们对适应度函数的了解。相比之下,基于模型的进化算法利用了以前评估解决方案中包含的数据模型的信息。由于一些选择决策依赖于模型而不是调用真实适应度函数的昂贵评估,因此进化算法的收敛性得到了提高。我们方案的新颖之处在于基于基于实例的适应度模型预选解决方案,其中选择压力根据模型的质量进行调整。这种所谓的λ控制根据监测到的模型质量调整真实适应度评估的数量。我们的方法通过对模型质量和预选压力控制的适当重新定义,将先前的基于模型的标量优化方法扩展到多目标问题。对多目标基准优化问题的分析不仅证实了与多目标进化策略相比,基于模型的进化策略的优越收敛性,而且还证实了与仅静态预选相比,调节预选的积极效果。