Lieux E M, Manning C K
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Delaware, Newark 19716.
J Am Diet Assoc. 1991 Feb;91(2):184-8.
Observations of labor activities of workers performing foodservice functions were made in eight senior centers at 5-minute intervals for 3 consecutive days. On-site preparation was limited to rethermalization of frozen entrees and portioning of bulk-delivered items. Time spent was assigned or allocated to either congregate or home-delivered meal service on the basis of number of meals served. Time in each component of direct work, indirect work, and delay was divided by meals served to provide the productivity ratio, labor minutes per meal. Comparisons were also made on the basis of number of meals served. An average of 12.78 minutes per meal was used to serve congregate meals and 21.05 minutes per meal for home-delivered meals. Two of the eight centers differed significantly in time used for direct work and total work to serve congregate-meal participants. There was no difference between centers in time used to serve homebound clients. The number of meals served did not influence productivity for either meal service site. These findings establish baseline data for the amount of time needed in one production system to serve meals to center participants and homebound clients. Managers of senior centers can use information about this food production and delivery system to make decisions about the most cost-effective method to provide meals.
连续三天,每隔5分钟对八个老年中心从事餐饮服务工作的员工的劳动活动进行观察。现场准备工作仅限于对冷冻主菜进行重新加热以及对批量配送的食品进行分份。根据提供的餐食数量,将花费的时间分配到集体用餐或上门送餐服务中。将直接工作、间接工作和延误各部分所花费的时间除以提供的餐食数量,得出生产率比率,即每餐的劳动分钟数。还根据提供的餐食数量进行了比较。集体用餐平均每餐用时12.78分钟,上门送餐平均每餐用时21.05分钟。八个中心中有两个在为集体用餐参与者提供服务时用于直接工作和总工作的时间存在显著差异。各中心在为居家客户提供服务的用时方面没有差异。提供的餐食数量对两个供餐地点的生产率均无影响。这些研究结果为一个生产系统中为中心参与者和居家客户提供餐食所需的时间量建立了基线数据。老年中心的管理人员可以利用有关这个食品生产和配送系统的信息,来决定提供餐食的最具成本效益的方法。