Baker C L, Hess R F, Zihl J
Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Neurosci. 1991 Feb;11(2):454-61. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.11-02-00454.1991.
A neurological patient (L.M.) suffering a specific loss of visual motion perception (Zihl et al., 1983) due to extrastriate cortical damage was studied using random dot "limited-lifetime" stimuli with a direction discrimination task. With a stimulus like that of Newsome and Pare (1988), the patient exhibited a severe deficit for motion perception, only being able to perform well for very high values of coherence. Different versions of the stimulus were employed to separate out the effects of limited lifetime versus the effects of additive noise as coherence was lowered. When all "signal" dots had a fixed, specified value of lifetime, and varying percentages of "noise" dots were added, the patient showed a profound deficit. In contrast, a stimulus consisting of no noise dots at all, and signal dots having fixed values of lifetime, revealed relatively good performance for surprisingly brief dot lifetimes. Thus, it is the presence of noisy, incoherent dot motion, rather than brief lifetimes, that causes such poor performance on the stimulus of Newsome and Pare (1988). Most surprising was the finding that the presence of even very small percentages of stationary noise dots was sufficient to disrupt totally direction discrimination of moving signal dots. The findings reported here suggest that one major role of extrastriate cortical processing might be the interpretation of stimuli that suffer from an impaired signal-to-noise ratio; the most commonly encountered form of "noise" would presumably be contamination by irrelevant directional spatio-temporal frequency components.
一名因纹外皮层损伤而出现特定视觉运动感知丧失的神经科患者(L.M.)(齐尔等人,1983年),采用随机点“有限寿命”刺激并结合方向辨别任务进行了研究。使用与纽瑟姆和帕尔(1988年)类似的刺激,该患者在运动感知方面表现出严重缺陷,仅在高相干值时才能表现良好。随着相干性降低,采用不同版本的刺激来区分有限寿命的影响与加性噪声的影响。当所有“信号”点具有固定、特定的寿命值,并添加不同百分比的“噪声”点时,患者表现出严重缺陷。相反,一种完全由无噪声点组成,且信号点具有固定寿命值的刺激,显示出即使点寿命惊人地短暂,患者的表现相对良好。因此,导致在纽瑟姆和帕尔(1988年)的刺激上表现如此之差的原因,是存在有噪声、不相干的点运动,而非短暂的寿命。最令人惊讶的是,发现即使存在非常小百分比的静止噪声点,也足以完全干扰移动信号点的方向辨别。此处报告的研究结果表明,纹外皮层处理的一个主要作用可能是解释那些信噪比受损的刺激;最常见的“噪声”形式大概是被无关的方向时空频率成分所污染。