Hess R H, Baker C L, Zihl J
Physiological Laboratory, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
J Neurosci. 1989 May;9(5):1628-40. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-05-01628.1989.
The "motion-blind" patient previously described by Zihl et al. (1983) was investigated using standard psychophysical procedures with stimuli whose spatial and temporal properties could be separately manipulated. Detection experiments for sinewave grating stimuli of varying spatial and temporal frequency showed sensitivity in this patient to be only slightly impaired. Temporal integration for stimuli of varying spatiotemporal frequency exhibited the expected space-time covariation seen in normal vision. An examination of the suprathreshold discriminative capacity of this patient was undertaken for spatial frequency, contrast, and temporal frequency. Although all of these discriminative functions were impaired, those concerning temporal frequency or velocity were dramatically reduced. No similar loss was seen for spatial frequency discrimination for moving or temporally varying stimuli. No measurable temporal frequency discrimination was present above 6 Hz and no velocity discrimination above 6 degrees/sec. Experiments involving the direction discrimination of suprathreshold drifting gratings of arrays of random dots revealed an inability to perceive direction of movement above a velocity of about 6 degrees/sec. Contrast thresholds contingent on direction of motion of a drifting grating also showed a much greater deficit than simple detection. Apparent motion using 2-flash random dot kinematograms revealed that the residual motion vision of this patient corresponded to the "short-range" motion process of normal vision. This process originally defined by Braddick (1974) operates over restricted space and time intervals. Apparent motion could only be supported by a narrow range of intermediate spatial displacements. These results suggest that this patient does exhibit some residual motion perception, probably corresponding to a severely impaired "short-range" mechanism. The patient's relatively intact ability to perform simple types of discrimination but severe impairment of performance at making judgments relevant to the nature of motion of the same stimuli suggests that while the components necessary for the analysis of motion are intact their more global associations have been disrupted. This implicates an extrastriate locus of the brain damage. Alternative explanations for the nature of the deficit are discussed.
使用标准心理物理学程序对齐尔等人(1983年)之前描述的“运动盲”患者进行了研究,所使用刺激的空间和时间特性可分别进行操控。对不同空间和时间频率的正弦波光栅刺激进行的检测实验表明,该患者的敏感性仅略有受损。对不同时空频率刺激的时间整合呈现出正常视觉中预期的时空协变。对该患者的阈上辨别能力进行了空间频率、对比度和时间频率方面的检查。尽管所有这些辨别功能都受损,但与时间频率或速度相关的功能受损程度显著降低。对于移动或随时间变化的刺激,空间频率辨别未出现类似的损失。在6赫兹以上不存在可测量的时间频率辨别,在6度/秒以上不存在速度辨别。涉及随机点阵列阈上漂移光栅方向辨别的实验表明,该患者无法感知速度约为6度/秒以上的运动方向。取决于漂移光栅运动方向的对比度阈值也显示出比简单检测大得多的缺陷。使用双闪随机点运动图的表观运动表明,该患者残余的运动视觉对应于正常视觉的“短程”运动过程。这个最初由布拉迪克(1974年)定义的过程在有限的空间和时间间隔内起作用。表观运动仅能由狭窄范围的中间空间位移支持。这些结果表明,该患者确实表现出一些残余的运动感知,可能对应于严重受损的“短程”机制。该患者执行简单类型辨别相对完好的能力,但在对相同刺激的运动性质进行判断时表现严重受损,这表明虽然分析运动所需的成分完好,但它们更全面的关联已被破坏。这意味着脑损伤位于纹外区。文中讨论了对缺陷性质的其他解释。