Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Ann Pharmacother. 2009 Dec;43(12):2044-63. doi: 10.1345/aph.1M225. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
To evaluate the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C.
Literature searches were conducted through PubMed (1949-June 2009), EMBASE (1980-June 2009), BIOSIS Previews (1969-June 2009), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-June 2009), Google, and www.clinicaltrials.gov using the terms ribavirin, therapeutic monitoring, hepatitis C, and drug levels. In addition, pertinent reference citations from identified publications were reviewed. Studies were limited to English language, adult age, and human subjects.
All articles identified from the data sources were evaluated. Studies that measured ribavirin concentrations or dose and treatment response were included in the review.
While monitoring of ribavirin plasma concentrations to improve treatment response in patients with chronic hepatitis C has been described in the literature, the utility of TDM for ribavirin in this group of patients has not been systematically studied. Thus, a previously published 9-step decision-making algorithm was employed to help determine whether TDM is warranted, based on currently available evidence. Thirty articles involving patients with chronic hepatitis C mono-infection, 12 for hepatitis C-HIV coinfection, 5 for renal dysfunction, and 5 for post-liver transplant patients were reviewed. In all subpopulations, studies exist that either support or refute the usefulness of ribavirin TDM. Additionally, the majority of the included studies had methodologic limitations, such as small sample size, retrospective analyses, and lack of p value adjustment for multiple analyses. Large randomized controlled trials would help to definitively answer this question.
There is conflicting evidence about the existence of a correlation between ribavirin concentrations and virologic response or development of toxicity. This inconsistent evidence, coupled with the currently employed effective strategies that maximize sustained virologic response and minimize development of anemia, precludes the utility of TDM for ribavirin.
评估利巴韦林治疗药物监测(TDM)在慢性丙型肝炎中的应用。
通过 PubMed(1949 年-2009 年 6 月)、EMBASE(1980 年-2009 年 6 月)、BIOSIS Previews(1969 年-2009 年 6 月)、国际药学文摘(1970 年-2009 年 6 月)、Google 和 www.clinicaltrials.gov 进行文献检索,使用的术语包括利巴韦林、治疗监测、丙型肝炎和药物水平。此外,还对已确定出版物中的相关参考文献进行了审查。研究仅限于英语、成人年龄和人体研究。
评估从数据源中识别的所有文章。包括测量利巴韦林浓度或剂量与治疗反应的研究均纳入本综述。
虽然在慢性丙型肝炎患者中已经描述了监测利巴韦林血浆浓度以改善治疗反应的方法,但尚未系统研究该组患者中利巴韦林 TDM 的实用性。因此,根据现有证据,采用了先前发表的 9 步决策算法来帮助确定是否需要 TDM。共审查了 30 篇涉及慢性丙型肝炎单感染患者、12 篇涉及丙型肝炎-艾滋病病毒合并感染患者、5 篇涉及肾功能不全患者和 5 篇涉及肝移植后患者的文章。在所有亚人群中,都有支持或反对利巴韦林 TDM 有用性的研究。此外,大多数纳入的研究都存在方法学局限性,如样本量小、回顾性分析和缺乏 p 值校正多个分析。大规模随机对照试验将有助于明确回答这个问题。
利巴韦林浓度与病毒学反应或毒性发展之间存在相关性的证据相互矛盾。这种不一致的证据,加上目前采用的最大限度提高持续病毒学反应和降低贫血发展的有效策略,排除了利巴韦林 TDM 的实用性。