Suppr超能文献

经颅直流电刺激联合经皮神经电刺激治疗慢性疼痛:一项初步研究。

Transcranial DC stimulation coupled with TENS for the treatment of chronic pain: a preliminary study.

机构信息

Núcleo de Neurociências, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Clin J Pain. 2009 Oct;25(8):691-5. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181af1414.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Based on evidence showing that electrical stimulation of the nervous system is an effective method to decrease chronic neurogenic pain, we aimed to investigate whether the combination of 2 methods of electrical stimulation-a method of peripheral stimulation [transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)] and a method of noninvasive brain stimulation [transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)]-induces greater pain reduction as compared with tDCS alone and sham stimulation.

METHODS

We performed a preliminary, randomized, sham-controlled, crossover, clinical study in which 8 patients were randomized to receive active tDCS/active TENS ("tDCS/TENS" group), active tDCS/sham TENS ("tDCS" group), and sham tDCS/sham TENS ("sham" group) stimulation. Assessments were performed immediately before and after each condition by a blinded rater.

RESULTS

The results showed that there was a significant difference in pain reduction across the conditions of stimulation (P=0.006). Post hoc tests showed significant pain reduction as compared with baseline after the tDCS/TENS condition [reduction by 36.5% (+/-10.7), P=0.004] and the tDCS condition [reduction by 15.5% (+/-4.9), P=0.014], but not after sham stimulation (P=0.35). In addition, tDCS/TENS induced greater pain reduction than tDCS (P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this pilot study suggest that the combination of TENS with tDCS has a superior effect compared with tDCS alone.

摘要

目的

有证据表明,刺激神经系统是减轻慢性神经性疼痛的有效方法,本研究旨在探讨两种电刺激方法(外周刺激[经皮神经电刺激(TENS)]和非侵入性脑刺激[经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)])的联合应用是否比单独使用 tDCS 及假刺激能带来更大的疼痛缓解。

方法

我们进行了一项初步的、随机的、假对照、交叉临床试验,将 8 例患者随机分为接受真 tDCS/真 TENS(“tDCS/TENS”组)、真 tDCS/假 TENS(“tDCS”组)和假 tDCS/假 TENS(“假刺激”组)刺激。由一名盲法评估者在每个条件下进行评估。

结果

结果显示,刺激条件下的疼痛缓解存在显著差异(P=0.006)。事后检验显示,tDCS/TENS 条件下[减少 36.5%(+/-10.7),P=0.004]和 tDCS 条件下[减少 15.5%(+/-4.9),P=0.014]的疼痛较基线显著减轻,但假刺激条件下无显著减轻(P=0.35)。此外,tDCS/TENS 引起的疼痛缓解优于 tDCS(P=0.02)。

结论

这项初步研究的结果表明,TENS 与 tDCS 的联合应用比单独使用 tDCS 具有更好的效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验