Deyo R A, Walsh N E, Martin D C, Schoenfeld L S, Ramamurthy S
Health Services Research and Development, Seattle Veterans Affairs Medical Center, WA 98108.
N Engl J Med. 1990 Jun 7;322(23):1627-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199006073222303.
A number of treatments are widely prescribed for chronic back pain, but few have been rigorously evaluated. We examined the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), a program of stretching exercises, or a combination of both for low back pain. Patients with chronic low back pain (median duration, 4.1 years) were randomly assigned to receive daily treatment with TENS (n = 36), sham TENS (n = 36), TENS plus a program of exercises (n = 37), or sham TENS plus exercises (n = 36). After one month no clinically or statistically significant treatment effect of TENS was found on any of 11 indicators of outcome measuring pain, function, and back flexion; there was no interactive effect of TENS with exercise. Overall improvement in pain indicators was 47 percent with TENS and 42 percent with sham TENS (P not significant). The 95 percent confidence intervals for group differences excluded a major clinical benefit of TENS for most outcomes. By contrast, after one month patients in the exercise groups had significant improvement in self-rated pain scores, reduction in the frequency of pain, and greater levels of activity as compared with patients in the groups that did not exercise. The mean reported improvement in pain scores was 52 percent in the exercise groups and 37 percent in the nonexercise groups (P = 0.02). Two months after the active intervention, however, most patients had discontinued the exercises, and the initial improvements were gone. We conclude that for patients with chronic low back pain, treatment with TENS is no more effective than treatment with a placebo, and TENS adds no apparent benefit to that of exercise alone.
目前,针对慢性背痛有多种广泛应用的治疗方法,但经过严格评估的却很少。我们研究了经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)、一套伸展运动方案或两者结合对腰痛的疗效。慢性腰痛患者(中位病程4.1年)被随机分配,分别接受每日TENS治疗(n = 36)、假TENS治疗(n = 36)、TENS加运动方案治疗(n = 37)或假TENS加运动方案治疗(n = 36)。一个月后,在测量疼痛、功能和背部前屈的11项结局指标中,未发现TENS有任何临床或统计学上显著的治疗效果;TENS与运动之间没有交互作用。TENS组疼痛指标的总体改善率为47%,假TENS组为42%(P值无统计学意义)。组间差异的95%置信区间排除了TENS对大多数结局有重大临床益处的可能性。相比之下,一个月后,与未运动组的患者相比,运动组的患者在自评疼痛评分方面有显著改善,疼痛频率降低,活动水平更高。运动组报告的疼痛评分平均改善率为52%,非运动组为37%(P = 0.02)。然而,在积极干预两个月后,大多数患者停止了运动,最初的改善也消失了。我们得出结论,对于慢性腰痛患者,TENS治疗并不比安慰剂治疗更有效,而且TENS单独使用并不比运动单独使用有明显益处。
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2009-2
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1984-5
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2024-7-18
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2024-5-2
Skin Res Technol. 2024-2
Inflammopharmacology. 2024-2