Sulcaj Laureta, Rizza Antonio, Glauber Mattia, Trianni Giuseppe, Palmieri Cataldo, Ravani Marcello, Dibra Alban, Maffei Stefano, Berti Sergio
G Monasterio Foundation, CNR-Regione Toscana, Institute of Clinical Physiology, G Pasquinucci Hospital, Massa, Italy.
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2009 Nov 17;7:54. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-7-54.
Repair of anterior leaflet prolapse is technically more challenging and this might influence outcomes as compared to the repair of posterior leaflet prolapse in patients undergoing surgical correction of mitral regurgitation. We investigated the association of anterior leaflet prolapse with minor residual mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP) who underwent valve repair.
Eligible for this study were consecutive patients with severe MR due to MVP, who underwent mitral valve repair with residual MR by postpump transesophageal echocardiography <or=2+ during a 20-month period at Pasquinucci Hospital, Massa. Patients undergoing other cardiovascular surgical interventions were excluded. Two groups were defined according to the involvement of mitral valve leaflets: group 1, consisting of patients with anterior leaflet prolapse (isolated or not); and group 2, consisting of patients with isolated posterior leaflet prolapse.
A total of 70 patients (18 in group 1 and 52 in group 2) were analyzed. Patients in group 2 were younger than those in group 1, but the difference was not significant (P = 0.052). There were no significant differences between the 2 study groups with respect to other variables. The proportion of patients with residual MR 1+/2+ was higher in group 1 than in group 2 (61.1% vs. 32.7%, respectively; P = 0.034). In a logistic regression model, anterior leaflet prolapse was an independent predictor of residual MR 1+/2+ (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.14 to 14.04; P = 0.03).
In our study population, patients with anterior leaflet prolapse had a higher proportion of residual MR 1+/2+ as compared to those with posterior leaflet prolapse after repair of mitral valve.
在接受二尖瓣反流手术矫正的患者中,与后叶脱垂修复相比,前叶脱垂修复在技术上更具挑战性,这可能会影响手术结果。我们调查了接受瓣膜修复的二尖瓣脱垂(MVP)患者中前叶脱垂与轻微残余二尖瓣反流(MR)之间的关联。
本研究的入选对象为因MVP导致严重MR且在马萨省帕斯奎努奇医院接受为期20个月的二尖瓣修复且术后经食管超声心动图显示残余MR≤2+的连续患者。排除接受其他心血管外科手术干预的患者。根据二尖瓣叶受累情况将患者分为两组:第1组,包括前叶脱垂(孤立或非孤立)患者;第2组,包括孤立后叶脱垂患者。
共分析了70例患者(第1组18例,第2组52例)。第2组患者比第1组患者年轻,但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.052)。两组在其他变量方面无显著差异。第1组残余MR 1+/2+的患者比例高于第2组(分别为61.1%和32.7%;P = 0.034)。在逻辑回归模型中,前叶脱垂是残余MR 1+/2+的独立预测因素(比值比,4.0;95%置信区间,1.14至14.04;P = 0.03)。
在我们的研究人群中,二尖瓣修复后,前叶脱垂患者的残余MR 1+/2+比例高于后叶脱垂患者。