Washington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Jan;103(1):519-30. doi: 10.1152/jn.00563.2009. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
Several regions of the brain are involved in smooth-pursuit eye movement (SPEM) control, including the cortical areas MST (medial superior temporal) and FEF (frontal eye field). It has been shown that the eye-movement responses to a brief perturbation of the visual target during ongoing pursuit increases with higher pursuit velocities. To further investigate the underlying neuronal mechanism of this nonlinear dynamic gain control and the contributions of different cortical areas to it, we recorded from MSTd (dorsal division of the MST area) neurons in behaving monkeys (Macaca mulatta) during step-ramp SPEM (5-20 degrees /s) with and without superimposed target perturbation (one cycle, 5 Hz, +/-10 degrees /s). Smooth-pursuit-related MSTd neurons started to increase their activity on average 127 ms after eye-movement onset. Target perturbation consistently led to larger eye-movement responses and decreasing latencies with increasing ramp velocities, as predicted by dynamic gain control. For 36% of the smooth-pursuit-related MSTd neurons the eye-movement perturbation was accompanied by detectable changes in neuronal activity with a latency of 102 ms, with respect to the eye-movement response. The remaining smooth-pursuit-related MSTd neurons (64%) did not reflect the eye-movement perturbation. For the large majority of cases this finding could be predicted by the dynamic properties of the step-ramp responses. Almost all these MSTd neurons had large visual receptive fields responding to motion in preferred directions opposite to the optimal SPEM stimulus. Based on these findings it is unlikely that MSTd plays a major role for dynamic gain control and initiation of the perturbation response. However, neurons in MSTd could still participate in SPEM maintenance. Due to their visual field properties they could also play a role in other functions such as self-motion perception.
大脑的几个区域参与平滑追随眼动(SPEM)控制,包括皮质区 MST(内侧上颞区)和 FEF(额眼区)。已经表明,在进行中的追逐过程中,对视觉目标的短暂扰动的眼动反应会随着更高的追逐速度而增加。为了进一步研究这种非线性动态增益控制的潜在神经元机制以及不同皮质区对其的贡献,我们在行为猴子(Macaca mulatta)中记录了 MSTd(MST 区的背部分区)神经元在阶跃-斜坡 SPEM(5-20 度/秒)期间的反应,同时伴有和不伴有叠加的目标扰动(一个周期,5 Hz,正负 10 度/秒)。与平滑追逐相关的 MSTd 神经元在眼动开始后平均 127 毫秒开始增加其活动。目标扰动一致导致更大的眼动反应和随着斜坡速度的增加而减小的潜伏期,如动态增益控制所预测的那样。对于 36%的与平滑追逐相关的 MSTd 神经元,眼动扰动伴随着神经元活动的可检测变化,相对于眼动反应,潜伏期为 102 毫秒。其余与平滑追逐相关的 MSTd 神经元(64%)没有反映眼动扰动。对于绝大多数情况,这一发现可以通过阶跃-斜坡反应的动态特性来预测。几乎所有这些 MSTd 神经元都有大的视觉感受野,对与最佳 SPEM 刺激相反的运动方向有反应。基于这些发现,MSTd 不太可能在动态增益控制和扰动反应的启动中发挥主要作用。然而,MSTd 中的神经元仍然可以参与 SPEM 的维持。由于它们的视野特性,它们还可以在其他功能中发挥作用,例如自我运动感知。