Keller Simon S, Roberts Neil, Hopkins William
Department of Neurology, University of Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany, The Magnetic Resonance and Image Analysis Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GE, United Kingdom.
J Neurosci. 2009 Nov 18;29(46):14607-16. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2892-09.2009.
The frontal operculum-classically considered to be Broca's area-has special significance and interest in clinical, cognitive, and comparative neuroscience given its role in spoken language and the long-held assumption that structural asymmetry of this region of cortex may be related to functional lateralization of human language. We performed a detailed morphological and morphometric analysis of this area of the brain in humans and chimpanzees using identical image acquisition parameters, image analysis techniques, and consistent anatomical boundaries in both species. We report great inter-individual variability of the sulcal contours defining the operculum in both species, particularly discontinuity of the inferior frontal sulcus in humans and bifurcation of the inferior precentral sulcus in chimpanzees. There was no evidence of population-based asymmetry of the frontal opercular gray matter in humans or chimpanzees. The diagonal sulcus was only identified in humans, and its presence was significantly (F = 12.782, p < 0.001) associated with total volume of the ipsilateral operculum. The findings presented here suggest that there is no population-based interhemispheric macroscopic asymmetry of Broca's area in humans or Broca's area homolog in chimpanzees. However, given that previous studies have reported asymmetry in the cytoarchitectonic fields considered to represent Broca's area-which is important given that cytoarchitectonic boundaries are more closely related to the regional functional properties of cortex relative to sulcal landmarks-it may be that the gross morphology of the frontal operculum is not a reliable indicator of Broca's area per se.
额盖——传统上被认为是布洛卡区——在临床、认知和比较神经科学中具有特殊的意义和研究价值,因为它在口语中发挥作用,而且长期以来人们一直认为该皮质区域的结构不对称可能与人类语言的功能侧化有关。我们使用相同的图像采集参数、图像分析技术以及在两个物种中一致的解剖边界,对人类和黑猩猩大脑的这一区域进行了详细的形态学和形态测量分析。我们报告了在两个物种中定义额盖的脑沟轮廓存在很大的个体间变异性,特别是人类额下沟的不连续性和黑猩猩中央前下沟的分叉。在人类或黑猩猩中,没有证据表明基于群体的额盖灰质不对称。对角沟仅在人类中被识别出,其存在与同侧额盖的总体积显著相关(F = 12.782,p < 0.001)。这里呈现的研究结果表明,在人类中不存在基于群体的布洛卡区半球间宏观不对称,在黑猩猩中也不存在布洛卡区同源物的半球间宏观不对称。然而,鉴于先前的研究报告了被认为代表布洛卡区的细胞构筑区域存在不对称——鉴于细胞构筑边界相对于脑沟标志与皮质的区域功能特性更密切相关,这一点很重要——可能额盖的总体形态本身并不是布洛卡区的可靠指标。