Hartnick Christopher J, Zurakowski David, Haver Kenan
Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Ear Nose Throat J. 2009 Nov;88(11):1213-7.
We conducted a study to determine if a five-item pediatric cough questionnaire (PCQ) is a valid and reliable means of measuring cough-specific quality of life in children. The five questions, which are answered by the child's parent or caregiver, cover cough frequency (Q1), sleep disturbance of the child (Q2), sleep disturbance of the parent (Q3), cough severity (Q4), and the degree of bothersomeness to the child (Q5). Each of the five items was scored on a 6-point Likert scale. The PCQ was administered three times. The first occurred when the parent telephoned to schedule an appointment for the child at a pediatric pulmonology outpatient clinic for a chief complaint of cough. The second PCQ was administered within 2 weeks of the first but before any treatment had been instituted so that test-retest reliability could be assessed. Each child was then diagnosed and treated in accordance with standard care practices. The third PCQ was administered 3 weeks after the second to determine if it would accurately reflect the parent's perception of how the child's cough had changed following treatment. Also, at the second and third encounters, parents were asked to provide their global assessment of whether their child's cough had improved, worsened, or stayed the same since the previous encounter. The parents of 120 children (70 boys and 50 girls; mean age: 6.8 yr) completed all three PCQs. Test-retest reliability was established (p < 0.001) for each of the five PCQ questions by Spearman correlation analysis (Q1: r = 0.5; Q2: r = 0.38; Q3: r = 0.42; Q4: r = 0.53; Q5: r = 0.5). Other statistical analyses confirmed the PCQ's internal consistency, discriminant validity, and convergent validity. Based on our findings, we conclude that the PCQ is a valid and reliable instrument with which to follow children with chronic cough longitudinally.
我们开展了一项研究,以确定一份包含五个条目的儿童咳嗽问卷(PCQ)是否为测量儿童咳嗽特异性生活质量的有效且可靠的方法。这五个问题由孩子的父母或照料者回答,涵盖咳嗽频率(问题1)、孩子的睡眠障碍(问题2)、父母的睡眠障碍(问题3)、咳嗽严重程度(问题4)以及咳嗽对孩子的困扰程度(问题5)。五个条目均采用6点李克特量表评分。PCQ进行了三次评估。第一次是在家长打电话为孩子预约小儿肺科门诊,以咳嗽为主诉就诊时。第二次PCQ评估在第一次评估后的2周内、但在开始任何治疗之前进行,以便评估重测信度。然后,每个孩子按照标准护理规范进行诊断和治疗。第三次PCQ评估在第二次评估后的3周进行,以确定其是否能准确反映家长对孩子咳嗽在治疗后变化的认知。此外,在第二次和第三次就诊时,要求家长对自上次就诊以来孩子的咳嗽是有所改善、恶化还是保持不变进行总体评估。120名儿童(70名男孩和50名女孩;平均年龄:6.8岁)的家长完成了所有三次PCQ评估。通过Spearman相关分析,五个PCQ问题中的每一个都建立了重测信度(p<0.001)(问题1:r = 0.5;问题2:r = 0.38;问题3:r = 0.42;问题4:r = 0.53;问题5:r = 0.5)。其他统计分析证实了PCQ的内部一致性、区分效度和聚合效度。基于我们的研究结果,我们得出结论,PCQ是一种有效且可靠的工具,可用于对慢性咳嗽儿童进行纵向随访。