Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Korea.
J Surg Oncol. 2010 May 1;101(6):451-6. doi: 10.1002/jso.21431.
To determine which optimal surgical procedure for middle-third advanced gastric cancer (AGC) based on comparative study of the long-term prognosis between total gastrectomy (TG) and distal gastrectomy (DG).
Between March 1993 and December 2005, 402 patients with middle-third AGC who underwent gastric resection were enrolled in this study. We analyzed the long-term prognosis according to the length of the proximal resection margin (PRM) and the extent of gastric resection, and determined independent prognostic factors.
TG was performed in 244 patients (60.7%) and DG was performed in 158 patients (39.3%). There were no significant differences in the 5-year survival rates according to the length of PRM. The 5-year survival rates of patients who underwent DG were significantly higher than the rates of the patients who underwent TG in curative cases (67.8% vs. 58.4%, P = 0.037). Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in the stage-stratified survival rates according to the extent of gastric resection. Multivariate analysis revealed that surgical curability, extent of lymphadenectomy, and stage were independent prognostic factors.
If curative resection can be performed, the long-term prognosis of patients with middle-third AGC was not affected by the length of PRM or the extent of gastric resection.
比较全胃切除术(TG)与远端胃切除术(DG)对中三分之一进展期胃癌(AGC)的长期预后,确定哪种手术方式为最佳术式。
1993 年 3 月至 2005 年 12 月,402 例中三分之一 AGC 患者接受胃切除术,根据近端切缘(PRM)长度和胃切除范围分析长期预后,并确定独立预后因素。
244 例(60.7%)患者行 TG,158 例(39.3%)患者行 DG。PRM 长度与 5 年生存率无显著相关性。根治性病例中,DG 组 5 年生存率显著高于 TG 组(67.8%比 58.4%,P = 0.037)。然而,胃切除范围的分层生存率无显著差异。多因素分析显示,手术可切除性、淋巴结清扫范围和分期是独立的预后因素。
如果能行根治性切除,中三分之一 AGC 患者的长期预后不受 PRM 长度或胃切除范围的影响。