Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2009 Jul-Aug;44(4):440-65. doi: 10.1080/13682820902929073.
Auditory Processing Disorder (APD) does not feature in mainstream diagnostic classifications such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV), but is frequently diagnosed in the United States, Australia and New Zealand, and is becoming more frequently diagnosed in the United Kingdom.
To familiarize readers with current controversies surrounding APD, with an emphasis on how APD might be conceptualized in relation to language and reading problems, attentional problems and autistic spectrum disorders.
METHODS & PROCEDURES: Different conceptual and diagnostic approaches adopted by audiologists and psychologists can lead to a confusing picture whereby the child who is regarded as having a specific learning disability by one group of experts may be given an APD diagnosis by another. While this could be indicative of co-morbidity, there are concerns that different professional groups are using different labels for the same symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: APD, as currently diagnosed, is not a coherent category, but that rather than abandoning the construct, we need to develop improved methods for assessment and diagnosis, with a focus on interdisciplinary evaluation.
听觉处理障碍(APD)并未出现在主流的诊断分类中,如《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第 4 版(DSM-IV),但它在美国、澳大利亚和新西兰被频繁诊断,在英国也越来越常见。
使读者熟悉当前围绕 APD 的争议,重点关注 APD 如何与语言和阅读问题、注意力问题和自闭症谱系障碍相关联的概念化。
听力学家和心理学家采用的不同概念和诊断方法可能导致混淆的情况,即被一组专家视为特定学习障碍的儿童可能被另一组专家诊断为 APD。虽然这可能表明存在共病,但有人担心不同的专业群体正在使用相同症状的不同标签。
目前诊断的 APD 不是一个连贯的类别,但我们需要发展改进的评估和诊断方法,重点是跨学科评估,而不是放弃这个概念。