Suppr超能文献

甲氨蝶呤与中药治疗银屑病的随机、安慰剂对照试验:评估疗效、安全性和生活质量。

Methotrexate versus traditional Chinese medicine in psoriasis: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to determine efficacy, safety and quality of life.

机构信息

Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Clin Exp Dermatol. 2010 Oct;35(7):717-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2009.03693.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is a common and chronic immune-mediated skin disorder, for which there is currently no cure. To our knowledge, this is the first randomized placebo-controlled trial comparing methotrexate and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in terms of efficacy, safety, and quality of life for the treatment of psoriasis.

METHODS

In total, 61 patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis were randomized to receive treatment with methotrexate, TCM or placebo for 6 months. The primary outcome measure was the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), and secondary outcome measures were the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) and the Psoriasis Disability Index (PDI).

RESULTS

In all, 50 patients completed the study and were included in the analysis. Dropout rates were highest in the TCM group. Mean PASI change from baseline at 6 months revealed an improvement of 73.9% of the methotrexate group, 15.1% of the TCM group and 32.0% of the placebo group. There was a significant difference between the three groups, with methotrexate showing greater effectiveness than the other two groups. No significant difference was found between the TCM and placebo groups. The methotrexate group also had greater improvement when assessed using the PGA and PDI.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results verify the therapeutic effect of methotrexate for the management of psoriasis. Despite widespread belief and use of TCM in Asia for the treatment of psoriasis, we were unable to confirm the efficacy of TCM in this study.

摘要

背景

银屑病是一种常见的慢性免疫介导性皮肤病,目前尚无治愈方法。据我们所知,这是首次比较甲氨蝶呤和中药(TCM)在治疗银屑病的疗效、安全性和生活质量方面的随机安慰剂对照试验。

方法

共有 61 例中度至重度斑块状银屑病患者随机分为接受甲氨蝶呤、TCM 或安慰剂治疗 6 个月。主要结局指标为银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI),次要结局指标为医生整体评估(PGA)和银屑病残疾指数(PDI)。

结果

共有 50 例患者完成了研究并纳入了分析。TCM 组的脱落率最高。6 个月时从基线的平均 PASI 变化显示,甲氨蝶呤组改善了 73.9%,TCM 组改善了 15.1%,安慰剂组改善了 32.0%。三组之间有显著差异,甲氨蝶呤组的疗效优于其他两组。TCM 组和安慰剂组之间没有显著差异。PGA 和 PDI 评估也显示甲氨蝶呤组的改善更大。

结论

我们的结果验证了甲氨蝶呤治疗银屑病的疗效。尽管亚洲广泛认为并使用 TCM 治疗银屑病,但我们未能在这项研究中证实 TCM 的疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验