Lewis B S, Wenger J S, Waye J D
Division of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1991 Feb;86(2):171-4.
Intraoperative endoscopy (IOE) is accepted as the ultimate diagnostic procedure for completely evaluating the small bowel in patients with obscure gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Small bowel enteroscopy (SBE) has been reported useful in the nonsurgical evaluation of the small intestine in these patients, but findings may be limited because of incomplete small bowel intubation and a lack of tip deflection. Twenty-three patients underwent 25 SBE exams and subsequently had 25 IOE exams during surgical exploration for continued bleeding. Patients' bleeding histories averaged 2 yr, with an average transfusion requirement of 27 units. Findings on IOE were the same as with SBE in 17/22 (77%) of examinations. We conclude that SBE and IOE are comparable in depth of insertion and ability to detect small vascular ectasias. Both procedures missed pathology due to limited visibility and the evanescent nature of ectasias. Long-term success in abolishing bleeding with these combined techniques can be expected in 55% of these patients. SBE should precede surgery, since the finding of diffuse ectasias precludes any benefit from operative intervention.
术中内镜检查(IOE)被公认为是对不明原因胃肠道(GI)出血患者的小肠进行全面评估的最终诊断方法。据报道,小肠镜检查(SBE)在这些患者的小肠非手术评估中有用,但由于小肠插管不完全和缺乏尖端偏转,其检查结果可能有限。23例患者接受了25次SBE检查,随后在手术探查期间因持续出血又接受了25次IOE检查。患者的出血病史平均为2年,平均输血需求量为27单位。在17/22(77%)的检查中,IOE的检查结果与SBE相同。我们得出结论,SBE和IOE在插入深度和检测小血管扩张的能力方面具有可比性。由于可见度有限和扩张的短暂性,两种检查方法均遗漏了病变。预计采用这些联合技术消除出血的长期成功率在这些患者中为55%。SBE应在手术前进行,因为弥漫性扩张的发现排除了手术干预的任何益处。