Petersen J, Moore R M, Kaczmarek R G, Singh B, Yeh I, Hamburger S, Kankam M
Department of Nephrology, Veterans Administration Medical Center/Stanford University, School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA.
Am J Kidney Dis. 1991 Feb;17(2):174-8. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(12)81125-5.
To further define the relationship between dialyzer reuse and the removal of beta 2-microglobulin (beta 2M) during dialysis, 26 patients who received hemodialysis were studied. Thirteen patients were dialyzed with conventional cuprophane dialyzers, and thirteen patients were dialyzed with high-flux polysulfone dialyzers. Patients in each group were dialyzed with only new dialyzers during the primary-use phase of the study, and reprocessed dialyzers during the reuse phase. Dialyzers were used six times during the reuse phase. Serum beta 2M levels were measured both predialysis and postdialysis, and adjusted for fluid loss. Dialysis with conventional cuprophane new dialyzers during the primary-use phase of the study resulted in a 3.3% increase in serum beta 2M levels, and a 2.4% increase in serum beta 2M levels during the reuse phase. The difference in the change of the concentration of beta 2M between primary-use and reuse phases was not statistically significant. Dialysis with high-flux polysulfone new dialyzers during the primary-use phase was associated with a decrease of 59.5% in the mean postdialysis concentration of serum beta 2M compared with the predialysis level. A corresponding decrease of 62.6% in serum beta 2M levels was observed after dialysis with high-flux polysulfone reprocessed dialyzers during the reuse phase. These data show no evidence of an adverse effect on the clearance of beta 2M during dialysis from the reuse of dialyzers up to six times. The results confirm previous studies that have reported that high-flux dialysis with polysulfone dialyzers removes substantial amounts of beta 2M, and dialysis with conventional cuprophane dialyzers does not.
为了进一步明确透析器复用与透析过程中β2-微球蛋白(β2M)清除之间的关系,对26例接受血液透析的患者进行了研究。13例患者使用传统铜仿膜透析器进行透析,13例患者使用高通量聚砜透析器进行透析。在研究的初次使用阶段,每组患者仅使用新透析器进行透析,在复用阶段则使用再处理透析器。透析器在复用阶段使用6次。在透析前和透析后均测量血清β2M水平,并对液体丢失进行校正。在研究的初次使用阶段,使用传统铜仿膜新透析器进行透析导致血清β2M水平升高3.3%,在复用阶段血清β2M水平升高2.4%。初次使用阶段和复用阶段β2M浓度变化的差异无统计学意义。在初次使用阶段,使用高通量聚砜新透析器进行透析与透析后血清β2M平均浓度较透析前水平降低59.5%相关。在复用阶段,使用高通量聚砜再处理透析器进行透析后,血清β2M水平相应降低62.6%。这些数据表明,透析器复用多达6次对透析过程中β2M的清除没有不良影响。结果证实了先前的研究报告,即使用聚砜透析器进行高通量透析可清除大量β2M,而使用传统铜仿膜透析器则不能。