• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

论出版伦理:惯例与实践综述

On publishing ethics: a review of conventions and practices.

作者信息

Hartocollis Peter

机构信息

University of Patras Medical School.

出版信息

Psychoanal Q. 2009 Oct;78(4):1185-96. doi: 10.1002/j.2167-4086.2009.tb00434.x.

DOI:10.1002/j.2167-4086.2009.tb00434.x
PMID:19928445
Abstract

A writer's work, whether scientific or literary, involves certain ethical risks, some of which are peculiar to psychoanalysis. Although the ethics of publishing reports that contain sensitive clinical material has been discussed extensively in the psychoanalytic literature, the ethics of publishing material taken from other publications or oral presentations that do not directly involve patients has been scarcely dealt with. This paper considers issues of ownership of such material, plagiarism, copyright and its violations, and the possibility of a negative reaction on the part of the original author. Characteristic cases are cited along with suggestions about how to handle them.

摘要

作家的作品,无论是科学类还是文学类,都存在一定的伦理风险,其中一些风险是精神分析学所特有的。尽管在精神分析文献中已经广泛讨论了发表包含敏感临床资料报告的伦理问题,但对于发表取自其他出版物或口头报告且不直接涉及患者的资料的伦理问题却鲜有涉及。本文探讨了此类资料的所有权、剽窃、版权及其侵权问题,以及原作者可能产生的负面反应。文中列举了典型案例,并就如何处理这些案例提出了建议。

相似文献

1
On publishing ethics: a review of conventions and practices.论出版伦理:惯例与实践综述
Psychoanal Q. 2009 Oct;78(4):1185-96. doi: 10.1002/j.2167-4086.2009.tb00434.x.
2
Authorship, plagiarism, and copyright transfer in the scientific universe.科学领域中的作者身份、抄袭与版权转让。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2019;74:e1312. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2019/e1312. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
3
The 'self-plagiarism' oxymoron: can one steal from oneself?“自我剽窃”这一矛盾修辞:人能从自己身上窃取吗?
Eur J Clin Invest. 2012 Mar;42(3):231-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2012.02645.x. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
4
Who wrote this paper? Basics of authorship and ethical issues.这篇论文是谁写的?署名的基本情况及伦理问题。
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Jan;11(1):76-7. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2003.08.015.
5
Legal and ethical aspects of ghostwriting in medicine.医学领域代笔的法律和伦理问题。
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2011 Feb;59(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s00005-010-0105-y. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
6
New copyright transfer and conflict-of-interest process for all authors.针对所有作者的新版权转让和利益冲突流程。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Apr;28(4):404. doi: 10.1097/01.PEC.0000412385.35852.a9.
7
Ethical and legal considerations regarding disputed authorship with the use of shared data.关于使用共享数据时争议性作者身份的伦理和法律考量。
Account Res. 2008 Apr-Jun;15(2):105-31. doi: 10.1080/08989620801946925.
8
[Letters to George Sylvester Viereck (1919-1936]. Published by Dominic Angeloch].
Luzif Amor. 2014;27(54):114-46.
9
International affairs. Some legal, ethical, and practical considerations for nurses who write.
J Prof Nurs. 1997 Jan-Feb;13(1):3. doi: 10.1016/s8755-7223(97)80017-8.
10
["Signs for the whole rest of the life". The house as symbol and autobiographical substrate in letters, dreams and literary texts by by Anna Freud].
Luzif Amor. 2015;28(56):130-45.