• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对关系自杀和互惠关系的探究。

An inquiry into relationship suicides and reciprocity.

机构信息

Criminal Justice Research Center at Ohio State University in Columbus, USA.

出版信息

Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2009 Oct;39(5):482-98. doi: 10.1521/suli.2009.39.5.482.

DOI:10.1521/suli.2009.39.5.482
PMID:19929149
Abstract

Few theories on suicide have been grounded in the norm of reciprocity. There is literature on suicide, however, describing motivations such as retaliation and retreat which can be interpreted as modes of adaptation to the norm of reciprocity. We propose a reciprocity-based theory to explain suicides associated with relationship problems. Employing a content analysis of suicide notes, we tested the theory, finding evidence of exploitation, exploiter guilt, retaliation, and retreat as motives for committing relationship-based suicide. Reciprocity-based note writers were more likely to have used alcohol or drugs in the hours prior to committing suicide, and they were also more likely to have made their intentions known beforehand. Implications for future research as well as for suicide prevention are discussed.

摘要

鲜有自杀理论扎根于互惠规范。然而,有自杀文献描述了报复和退缩等动机,这些动机可以被解释为适应互惠规范的模式。我们提出了一个基于互惠的理论来解释与人际关系问题相关的自杀。通过对自杀遗言进行内容分析,我们验证了这一理论,发现了利用、施害者内疚、报复和退缩作为人际关系自杀动机的证据。基于互惠的遗言撰写者在自杀前几小时更有可能使用酒精或毒品,并且他们也更有可能事先表明自己的意图。讨论了对未来研究以及自杀预防的影响。

相似文献

1
An inquiry into relationship suicides and reciprocity.对关系自杀和互惠关系的探究。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2009 Oct;39(5):482-98. doi: 10.1521/suli.2009.39.5.482.
2
Thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness in suicide notes.自杀笔记中的归属感缺失和被感知的累赘感。
Crisis. 2012 Jan 1;33(3):178-81. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000123.
3
A comparison of suicide note writers with suicides who did not leave notes.有自杀遗言者与无自杀遗言者的比较。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2009 Oct;39(5):558-68. doi: 10.1521/suli.2009.39.5.558.
4
Suicide Notes: Their Utility in Understanding the Motivations Behind Suicide and Preventing Future Ones.自杀笔记:理解自杀动机和预防未来自杀的有用工具。
Arch Suicide Res. 2019 Oct-Dec;23(4):576-589. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2018.1480985. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
5
[Analysis of suicide notes form persons committing completed suicides].[对已完成自杀者遗书的分析]
Psychiatr Hung. 2005;20(4):271-80.
6
[Risk factors for suicide in substance-related disorders].[物质相关障碍中的自杀风险因素]
Psychiatr Prax. 2006 Mar;33(2):81-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-866858.
7
Who leaves suicide notes? A six-year population-based study.谁会留下遗书?一项基于人群的六年研究。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2015 Jun;45(3):326-34. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12131. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
8
Are Suicide Note Writers Representative of All Suicides? Analysis of the National Violent Death Reporting System.自杀笔记撰写者是否能代表所有自杀者?对国家暴力死亡报告系统的分析。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2018 Feb;48(1):12-20. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12320. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
9
The content of suicide notes from attempters and completers.自杀未遂者和自杀成功者遗书的内容。
Crisis. 2007;28(2):102-4. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910.28.2.102.
10
Poor social integration and suicide: fact or artifact? A case-control study.社会融合不良与自杀:事实还是假象?一项病例对照研究。
Psychol Med. 2004 Oct;34(7):1331-7. doi: 10.1017/s0033291704002600.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Multidimensional Revenge Attitudes Inventory-21.多维报复态度量表-21 的心理测量学特性评估。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Dec;32(12):1172-1183. doi: 10.1037/pas0000951. Epub 2020 Sep 14.