Suppr超能文献

一种新型腹腔镜打结替代装置的应用及强度的体外评估。

An ex-vivo evaluation of the application and strength of a novel laparoscopic knot substitute device.

作者信息

Chi Thomas, Eisner Brian H, Berger Aaron D, Stoller Marshall L

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of California-San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2010 Jan;24(1):95-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0007.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Intracorporeal suturing can be challenging, especially in the case of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. During these procedures, suturing must reapproximate renal tissue to achieve hemostasis but not tear through tissue. We present a new device, the ANPA Suturelock, which can be adjusted to increase or decrease suture tension, optimizing tissue apposition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two participants (one experienced laparoscopist, one junior resident) completed the protocol. A laparoscopic trainer was used to secure 2-0 polyglactin suture ends in rubber foam using five of each of the following: Traditional laparoscopic suture knots (one surgeon's knot and two square knots), square-to-slip knots, Weston extracorporeal knots, ANPA Suturelock, Lapra-Ty devices, Hem-O-Lock clips, and titanium clips. Tensile strength of each knot and knot substitute was measured using an Instron machine (Instron, Norwood, MA). Time to secure the two suture ends was measured for ANPA Suturelock and laparoscopic surgeon's knot. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t test.

RESULTS

Mean tensile strength of the three knot-tying methods was 53.0 newtons (N) while that of the four knot substitute devices was 8.3 N (P < 0.001). Each of the three individual knot-tying methods had significantly greater tensile strength than any of the knot substitutes (P < 0.001 for all). Of the knot-tying methods, the surgeon's knot was the strongest (mean tensile strength 63.2 N) and was significantly stronger than square-to-slip and Weston extracorporeal knots (39.1 N and 48.4 N, respectively, P < 0.05 for both). Of the knot substitutes, ANPA Suturelock (mean tensile strength 14.7 N) was significantly stronger than Lapra-Ty (6.1 N), Hem-O-Lock (5.4 N), and titanium clip (3.0 N) (P < 0.01 for all). When compared with a laparoscopic surgeon's knot, the time to securing the ANPA Suturelock was significantly quicker for a third year resident (106 sec vs 38 sec, P < 0.001) and an experienced laparoscopist (75 sec vs 23 sec, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The tensile strengths of traditional knot-tying techniques were greater than that of any knot substitute device. The ANPA Suturelock provided the greatest tensile strength of any knot substitute. The time to secure a knot using the ANPA device was also significantly quicker than tying a standard surgeon's knot.

摘要

背景与目的

体内缝合颇具挑战性,尤其是在腹腔镜部分肾切除术的情况下。在这些手术过程中,缝合必须使肾组织重新对合以实现止血,但又不能撕裂组织。我们介绍一种新装置——ANPA缝合锁,它可以进行调整以增加或减少缝合张力,从而优化组织对合。

材料与方法

两名参与者(一名经验丰富的腹腔镜手术医生,一名初级住院医生)完成了该方案。使用腹腔镜训练器,在橡胶泡沫中固定2-0聚乙醇酸缝线末端,每种方法各使用5次,包括:传统腹腔镜缝合结(一个外科结和两个方结)、方结转滑结、韦斯顿体外结、ANPA缝合锁、拉普拉蒂器械、Hem-O-Lock夹和钛夹。使用英斯特朗材料试验机(英斯特朗公司,马萨诸塞州诺伍德)测量每个结和结替代物的拉伸强度。测量使用ANPA缝合锁和腹腔镜外科结固定两个缝线末端的时间。采用学生t检验进行统计分析。

结果

三种打结方法的平均拉伸强度为53.0牛顿(N),而四种结替代装置的平均拉伸强度为8.3 N(P < 0.001)。三种单独的打结方法中的每一种的拉伸强度都显著高于任何一种结替代物(所有P值均 < 0.001)。在打结方法中,外科结最强(平均拉伸强度63.2 N),且显著强于方结转滑结和韦斯顿体外结(分别为39.1 N和48.4 N,两者P < 0.05)。在结替代物中,ANPA缝合锁(平均拉伸强度14.7 N)显著强于拉普拉蒂器械(6.1 N)、Hem-O-Lock夹(5.4 N)和钛夹(3.0 N)(所有P < 0.01)。与腹腔镜外科结相比,三年级住院医生使用ANPA缝合锁固定结的时间显著更快(106秒对38秒,P < 0.001),经验丰富的腹腔镜手术医生也是如此(75秒对23秒,P = 0.02)。

结论

传统打结技术的拉伸强度大于任何结替代装置。ANPA缝合锁在所有结替代物中提供了最大的拉伸强度。使用ANPA装置固定结的时间也显著快于打标准外科结的时间。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验