Suppr超能文献

脾外伤。治疗方法的选择。

Splenic trauma. Choice of management.

作者信息

Lucas C E

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 1991 Feb;213(2):98-112. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199102000-00002.

Abstract

The modern era for splenic surgery for injury began in 1892 when Riegner reported a splenectomy in a 14-year-old construction worker who fell from a height and presented with abdominal pain, distension, tachycardia, and oliguria. This report set the stage for routine splenectomy, which was performed for all splenic injury in the next two generations. Despite early reports by Pearce and by Morris and Bullock that splenectomy in animals caused impaired defenses against infection, little challenge to routine splenectomy was made until King and Schumacker in 1952 reported a syndrome of "overwhelming postsplenectomy infection" (OPSI). Many studies have since demonstrated the importance of the spleen in preventing infections, particularly from the encapsulated organisms. Overwhelming postsplenectomy infection occurs in about 0.6% of children and 0.3% of adults. Intraoperative splenic salvage has become more popular and can be achieved safely in most patients by delivering the spleen with the pancreas to the incision, carefully repairing the spleen under direct vision, and using the many adjuncts to suture repair, including hemostatic agents and splenic wrapping. Intraoperative splenic salvage is not indicated in patients actively bleeding from other organs or in the presence of alcoholic cirrhosis. The role of splenic replantation in those patients requiring operative splenectomy needs further study but may provide significant long-term splenic function. Although nonoperative splenic salvage was first suggested more than 100 years ago by Billroth, this modality did not become popular in children until the 1960s or in adults until the latter 1980s. Patients with intrasplenic hematomas or with splenic fractures that do not extend to the hilum as judged by computed tomography usually can be observed successfully without operative intervention and without blood transfusion. Nonoperative splenic salvage is less likely with fractures that involve the splenic hilum and with the severely shattered spleen; these patients usually are treated best by early operative intervention. Following splenectomy for injury, polyvalent pneumococcal vaccine decreases the likelihood of OPSI and should be used routinely. The role of prophylactic penicillin is uncertain but the use of antibiotics for minor infectious problems is indicated after splenectomy.

摘要

脾脏损伤外科手术的现代时代始于1892年,当时里格纳报告了一例在一名14岁建筑工人身上实施的脾切除术,该工人从高处坠落,出现腹痛、腹胀、心动过速和少尿症状。这一报告为常规脾切除术奠定了基础,在接下来的两代人中,所有脾脏损伤都进行了脾切除术。尽管皮尔斯以及莫里斯和布洛克早期报告称,动物脾切除术后抗感染防御能力受损,但直到1952年金和舒马克报告了“脾切除术后暴发性感染”(OPSI)综合征,常规脾切除术才受到很少质疑。此后许多研究证明了脾脏在预防感染,尤其是来自包膜菌感染方面的重要性。脾切除术后暴发性感染在约0.6%的儿童和0.3%的成人中发生。术中脾脏挽救变得更受欢迎,并且在大多数患者中通过将脾脏与胰腺一起送至切口、在直视下仔细修复脾脏以及使用许多缝合修复辅助手段(包括止血剂和脾脏包裹)能够安全实现。对于其他器官正在出血的患者或存在酒精性肝硬化的患者,不适合进行术中脾脏挽救。对于那些需要进行手术脾切除的患者,脾脏移植的作用需要进一步研究,但可能会提供显著的长期脾脏功能。尽管非手术性脾脏挽救早在100多年前就由比尔罗特首次提出,但这种方式直到20世纪60年代在儿童中才开始流行,在成人中直到20世纪80年代后期才开始流行。经计算机断层扫描判断为脾内血肿或脾破裂未延伸至脾门的患者通常可以在不进行手术干预和不输血的情况下成功观察。涉及脾门的骨折以及严重破碎的脾脏进行非手术性脾脏挽救的可能性较小;这些患者通常通过早期手术干预治疗效果最佳。因损伤进行脾切除术后,多价肺炎球菌疫苗可降低OPSI的可能性,应常规使用。预防性青霉素的作用尚不确定,但脾切除术后对于轻微感染问题使用抗生素是有必要的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fb7/1358380/3f1f18642853/annsurg00156-0024-a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验