• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为养老院居民执行医疗保健持久授权书以及关于使用维持生命治疗的偏好的决定。

The decision to execute a durable power of attorney for health care and preferences regarding the utilization of life-sustaining treatments in nursing home residents.

作者信息

Cohen-Mansfield J, Rabinovich B A, Lipson S, Fein A, Gerber B, Weisman S, Pawlson L G

机构信息

Research Institute of the Hebrew Home of Greater Washington, Rockville, Md 20852.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 1991 Feb;151(2):289-94.

PMID:1992956
Abstract

One hundred three nursing home residents were interviewed regarding their preferences for the choice of an agent for health-care decision making while being offered the opportunity to execute a Durable Power of Attorney for health care. They also completed a questionnaire that tapped their preferences regarding the use of four types of life-support treatment under three hypothetical levels of future cognitive functioning. Factors that might influence these preferences, such as previous experiences with life-sustaining treatments, religious beliefs, and personal values, were also examined. Participants tended to choose their son or daughter as their agent for future health-care decision making. They had clear and consistent patterns of preferences regarding the utilization of life-sustaining treatment. Generally, participants opted not to be treated, although there was variability among participants. They were even less inclined to opt for treatment as their perceived level of future cognitive functioning declined, or when the life-sustaining treatment involved permanent rather than temporary procedures.

摘要

103名疗养院居民接受了访谈,询问他们在有机会签署医疗保健持久授权书时,对于选择医疗保健决策代理人的偏好。他们还完成了一份问卷,该问卷探讨了在未来三种假设认知功能水平下,他们对使用四种生命维持治疗的偏好。还研究了可能影响这些偏好的因素,如既往维持生命治疗的经历、宗教信仰和个人价值观。参与者倾向于选择他们的儿子或女儿作为未来医疗保健决策的代理人。他们在生命维持治疗的使用方面有明确且一致的偏好模式。一般来说,参与者选择不接受治疗,尽管参与者之间存在差异。随着他们感知到的未来认知功能水平下降,或者当生命维持治疗涉及永久性而非临时性程序时,他们更不愿意选择接受治疗。

相似文献

1
The decision to execute a durable power of attorney for health care and preferences regarding the utilization of life-sustaining treatments in nursing home residents.为养老院居民执行医疗保健持久授权书以及关于使用维持生命治疗的偏好的决定。
Arch Intern Med. 1991 Feb;151(2):289-94.
2
Canadian outpatients and advance directives: poor knowledge and little experience but positive attitudes.加拿大门诊患者与预立医疗指示:知识匮乏、经验欠缺但态度积极。
CMAJ. 1993 May 1;148(9):1497-502.
3
Relationship of general advance directive instructions to specific life-sustaining treatment preferences in patients with serious illness.重病患者的一般预立医疗指示与特定维持生命治疗偏好的关系。
Arch Intern Med. 1992 Oct;152(10):2114-22.
4
Physicians' predictions of elderly outpatients' preferences for life-sustaining treatment.医生对老年门诊患者维持生命治疗偏好的预测。
J Fam Pract. 1993 Nov;37(5):469-75.
5
Termination of life-sustaining medical treatment: who should exercise a patient's right to die?终止维持生命的医疗治疗:谁应行使患者的死亡权?
Health Care Superv. 1994 Jun;12(4):60-72.
6
Living wills: making life and death decisions.生前预嘱:做出生死抉择。
Provider. 1991 Feb;17(2):14-8, 20, 22-3.
7
Durable power of attorney for health care. A survey of senior center participants.医疗保健的持久授权书。对老年中心参与者的一项调查。
Arch Intern Med. 1992 Feb;152(2):292-6.
8
The values history. The evaluation of the patient's values and advance directives.价值观历史。对患者价值观和预先指示的评估。
J Fam Pract. 1991 Feb;32(2):145-53.
9
Living wills and resuscitation preferences in an elderly population.老年人群的生前预嘱与复苏意愿
Arch Intern Med. 1995 Jan 23;155(2):171-5.
10
Stability of preferences regarding life-sustaining treatment: a two-year prospective study of nursing home residents.关于维持生命治疗的偏好稳定性:对养老院居民的一项为期两年的前瞻性研究。
Mt Sinai J Med. 2003 Mar;70(2):85-92.

引用本文的文献

1
CARE ALTERNATIVES IN PRISON SYSTEMS: Factors Influencing End-of-Life Treatment Selection.监狱系统中的护理选择:影响临终治疗选择的因素
Crim Justice Behav. 2009 Jun;36(6):620-634. doi: 10.1177/0093854809334442. Epub 2009 May 7.
2
Advance Care Planning in the Context of Dementia: Defining Concordance.痴呆症背景下的预先医疗指示规划:定义一致性。
Gerontologist. 2024 Jun 1;64(6). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae029.
3
Do Patients Want their Families or their Doctors to Make Treatment Decisions in the Event of Incapacity, and Why?如果患者丧失行为能力,他们希望家人还是医生做出治疗决策?原因何在?
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2016;7(4):251-259. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2016.1182235. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
4
Examining Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders Among Newly Admitted Residents of Long-term Care Facilities.调查长期护理机构新入院居民的“不要复苏”医嘱情况。
Palliat Care. 2014 Mar 12;8:1-6. doi: 10.4137/PCRT.S13042. eCollection 2014.
5
Pathways from religion to advance care planning: beliefs about control over length of life and end-of-life values.宗教与预先医疗照护计划的关联途径:对寿命掌控和临终价值观的信念。
Gerontologist. 2013 Oct;53(5):801-16. doi: 10.1093/geront/gns128. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
6
Documentation and discussion of preferences for care among patients with advanced cancer.晚期癌症患者的护理偏好的记录和讨论。
J Oncol Pract. 2011 Nov;7(6):361-6. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000364.
7
Review of measurement instruments in clinical and research ethics, 1999-2003.1999 - 2003年临床与研究伦理测量工具综述
J Med Ethics. 2006 Mar;32(3):153-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.012567.
8
Increasing use of DNR orders in the elderly worldwide: whose choice is it?全球范围内老年患者中“不要复苏”医嘱的使用增加:这是谁的选择?
J Med Ethics. 2002 Oct;28(5):303-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.28.5.303.
9
Assessing values: the neglected dimension in long-term care.
HEC Forum. 1997 Sep;9(3):264-75. doi: 10.1023/a:1008897121837.
10
The PSDA and treatment refusal by a depressed older patient committed to the state mental hospital.《患者自主决定法》与一名被送进州立精神病院的老年抑郁症患者拒绝治疗的情况。
HEC Forum. 1993 Sep;5(5):289-301. doi: 10.1007/BF01560483.