Center for Developmental Research, School of Law, Psychology, and Social Work, Orebro University, 701 82, Orebro, Sweden.
Child Dev. 2009 Nov-Dec;80(6):1722-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01364.x.
To determine whether adolescents interpret parental behavioral and psychological control differently, type, level, and domain of control were manipulated across 3 interpretations (adolescents' competence, mattering to parents, and parental intrusiveness). As expected, adolescents (N = 67, M = 14.25 years) generally interpreted high levels of behavioral control more negatively than moderate behavioral control. At high levels, however, adolescents did not differentiate behavioral control and psychological control, interpreting both as indicating less mattering and more intrusiveness. Furthermore, high levels of control over personal domain issues, regardless of type, tended to be interpreted most negatively. In conclusion, adolescents construe control in ways that may have import for their adjustment and this should be accounted for in theoretical models of parental control.
为了确定青少年是否对父母的行为和心理控制有不同的解释,我们在 3 种解释(青少年的能力、对父母的重要性和父母的侵扰性)中对控制的类型、水平和领域进行了操纵。正如预期的那样,青少年(N=67,M=14.25 岁)通常对高水平的行为控制的解释比中水平的行为控制更负面。然而,在高水平上,青少年并没有区分行为控制和心理控制,而是将两者都解释为表明对孩子的重视程度较低和侵扰性较高。此外,无论类型如何,对个人领域问题的高水平控制往往被解释为最负面的。总之,青少年以可能对他们的适应有重要影响的方式来理解控制,这应该在父母控制的理论模型中得到考虑。