Clermont-Ferrand Teaching Hospital, Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery Dept, Gabriel Montpied Hospital, BP 69, 63003 Clermont-Ferrand cedex 01, France.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 Dec;95(8):627-31. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.10.003.
Knowledge of the mechanisms of bicruciate lesions and dislocation of the knee enables analysis and classification in terms of injuries' location and type, guiding surgery and facilitating assessment. Careful history taking and clinical examination shed light on the mechanism involved, but exact identification of the lesion further requires examination under anesthesia and static and dynamic X-rays and MRI, which together enable precise determination of lesion type and location. There are two types of mechanism: gaping, causing ligament tear; and translation, causing detachment. When a single mechanism is involved, the lesion is said to be "simple". Simple gaping causes bicruciate lesions without medial, lateral or posterior dislocation. Simple translation causes pure anterior or posterior dislocation. Gaping and translation may also occur in combination, causing dislocation with peripheral tearing. There are two types of classification: descriptive, based on X-ray findings--i.e., static classification; and physiopathological, based on clinical and dynamic X-ray findings. MRI further explores ligament detachment and bone lesions that are inaccessible to clinical and conventional X-ray examination. Physiopathological assessment-based techniques enable surgical procedure to be refined, defining the surgical approach according to lesion location and differentiating between lesions requiring repair (tears) and those with a good likelihood of spontaneous healing (capsuloperiosteal detachment). The classification advocated here is largely inspired by that of Neyret and Rongieras, extended to include dislocation with single bicruciate ligament lesion. It covers peripheral lesions completely, specifying type (tear or detachment) and including all bicruciate lesions as well as dislocations.
对膝关节十字韧带损伤和脱位机制的了解,使我们能够根据损伤的位置和类型进行分析和分类,指导手术并便于评估。仔细的病史采集和临床检查可以揭示损伤机制,但要准确确定损伤部位,还需要在麻醉下进行静态和动态 X 光检查以及 MRI 检查,这些检查共同确定损伤类型和部位。有两种机制:开口型,导致韧带撕裂;平移型,导致韧带撕脱。当涉及单一机制时,损伤被称为“单纯型”。单纯开口型引起十字韧带损伤,但无内侧、外侧或后脱位。单纯平移型引起单纯前或后脱位。开口型和平移型也可能同时发生,导致伴有周围撕裂的脱位。有两种分类方法:描述性的,基于 X 光发现,即静态分类;和基于临床和动态 X 光发现的病理生理分类。MRI 进一步探讨了临床和常规 X 光检查无法触及的韧带撕脱和骨损伤。基于病理生理评估的技术可以使手术方法得到改进,根据损伤部位确定手术入路,并区分需要修复(撕裂)的损伤和有很大可能自行愈合(囊骨膜分离)的损伤。这里提倡的分类主要受到 Neyret 和 Rongieras 的分类的启发,并扩展到包括伴有单一十字韧带损伤的脱位。它完全涵盖了周围损伤,指定了类型(撕裂或撕脱),并包括了所有的十字韧带损伤和脱位。