Pneumococcal Laboratory, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Vaccine. 2010 Feb 3;28(5):1333-40. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.11.011. Epub 2009 Nov 21.
Quantitation of specific IgG to polysaccharides (serotypes) of Streptococcus pneumoniae provides the basis for evaluating vaccine efficacy. Different enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods are used internationally, making comparisons between laboratories difficult. We undertook an inter-laboratory comparison between two international laboratories performing serotype-specific IgG ELISAs using a panel of well-characterized serum samples: the Murdoch Childrens Research Institute Pneumococcal Laboratory (Melbourne, Australia) and the Vaccine Immunology Laboratory, National Public Health Institute (Helsinki, Finland). While good agreement was found for the inter-laboratory comparison for most serotypes, differences in ELISA methodology influenced specific IgG measurement. Therefore, use of the World Health Organization (WHO)-based ELISA methods for measurement of serotype-specific IgG is reliable, accurate and provides consistent results between international laboratories.
对肺炎链球菌多糖(血清型)特异性 IgG 的定量分析为评估疫苗效力提供了依据。国际上使用了不同的酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)方法,使得实验室之间的比较变得困难。我们在两家国际实验室之间进行了一项血清型特异性 IgG ELISA 的实验室间比较,使用了一组特征明确的血清样本:默多克儿童研究所肺炎球菌实验室(澳大利亚墨尔本)和国家公共卫生研究所疫苗免疫学实验室(芬兰赫尔辛基)。虽然大多数血清型的实验室间比较结果一致性较好,但 ELISA 方法的差异影响了特异性 IgG 的测量。因此,使用基于世界卫生组织(WHO)的 ELISA 方法测量血清型特异性 IgG 是可靠、准确的,并在国际实验室之间提供一致的结果。