Suppr超能文献

肺炎球菌血清型特异性 IgG 测量的实验室间比较结果,以及影响检测性能的关键参数。

Results from an inter-laboratory comparison of pneumococcal serotype-specific IgG measurement and critical parameters that affect assay performance.

机构信息

Pneumococcal Laboratory, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2010 Feb 3;28(5):1333-40. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.11.011. Epub 2009 Nov 21.

Abstract

Quantitation of specific IgG to polysaccharides (serotypes) of Streptococcus pneumoniae provides the basis for evaluating vaccine efficacy. Different enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods are used internationally, making comparisons between laboratories difficult. We undertook an inter-laboratory comparison between two international laboratories performing serotype-specific IgG ELISAs using a panel of well-characterized serum samples: the Murdoch Childrens Research Institute Pneumococcal Laboratory (Melbourne, Australia) and the Vaccine Immunology Laboratory, National Public Health Institute (Helsinki, Finland). While good agreement was found for the inter-laboratory comparison for most serotypes, differences in ELISA methodology influenced specific IgG measurement. Therefore, use of the World Health Organization (WHO)-based ELISA methods for measurement of serotype-specific IgG is reliable, accurate and provides consistent results between international laboratories.

摘要

对肺炎链球菌多糖(血清型)特异性 IgG 的定量分析为评估疫苗效力提供了依据。国际上使用了不同的酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)方法,使得实验室之间的比较变得困难。我们在两家国际实验室之间进行了一项血清型特异性 IgG ELISA 的实验室间比较,使用了一组特征明确的血清样本:默多克儿童研究所肺炎球菌实验室(澳大利亚墨尔本)和国家公共卫生研究所疫苗免疫学实验室(芬兰赫尔辛基)。虽然大多数血清型的实验室间比较结果一致性较好,但 ELISA 方法的差异影响了特异性 IgG 的测量。因此,使用基于世界卫生组织(WHO)的 ELISA 方法测量血清型特异性 IgG 是可靠、准确的,并在国际实验室之间提供一致的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验