• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外压电碎石术对输尿管结石治疗的影响:一项审计

The impact of extracorporeal piezoelectric lithotripsy on the management of ureteric calculi: an audit.

作者信息

Parr N J, Ritchie A W, Moussa S A, Tolley D A

机构信息

Scottish Lithotriptor Centre, Deaconess Hospital, Edinburgh.

出版信息

Br J Urol. 1991 Jan;67(1):18-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1991.tb15061.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410x.1991.tb15061.x
PMID:1993271
Abstract

The presentation and management of 153 patients with ureteric calculi requiring active treatment over a 12-month period were reviewed; 74% of patients had primary ureteric calculi and 26% had ureteric calculi composed of fragments resulting from extracorporeal piezoelectric shockwave lithotripsy (EPL) to renal calculi; 32 patients (21%) had more than 1 calculus or a steinstrasse. The primary procedures included were in situ EPL (n = 54), push-bang (44), retrograde ureteroscopy (40), Dormia basket extraction (6), push-pull (1), antegrade ureteroscopy (1) and combinations of these (7). The success of the primary procedure could not be predicted from stone size, site or duration in the ureter, but upper tract dilatation was significantly less (p less than 0.01) in the successful group. The overall success rate for complete stone extraction was 97%, but 54 patients (35%) required more than 1 procedure to achieve this. In situ EPL and push-bang, as either primary or secondary procedures, were successful in treating 79 patients (52%); 2 patients required ureterolithotomy (1.3%). The overall complication rate was 18%. Since EPL is only successful in treating approximately half of ureteric calculi, a range of other treatments should be available to maintain a low rate of open surgery.

摘要

回顾了153例在12个月期间需要积极治疗的输尿管结石患者的临床表现及治疗情况;74%的患者为原发性输尿管结石,26%的患者输尿管结石由体外压电冲击波碎石术(EPL)治疗肾结石后产生的碎片组成;32例患者(21%)有不止1块结石或石街。主要采用的治疗方法包括原位EPL(n = 54)、推撞法(44)、逆行输尿管镜检查(40)、Dormia网篮取石术(6)、推拉法(1)、顺行输尿管镜检查(1)以及这些方法的联合应用(7)。无法根据结石大小、位置或在输尿管内的存留时间预测初次治疗的成功率,但成功组的上尿路扩张明显较少(p < 0.01)。结石完全取出的总体成功率为97%,但54例患者(35%)需要不止1次治疗才能达到这一目标。原位EPL和推撞法,作为初次或二次治疗方法,成功治疗了79例患者(52%);2例患者需要进行输尿管切开取石术(1.3%)。总体并发症发生率为18%。由于EPL仅能成功治疗约一半的输尿管结石,应提供一系列其他治疗方法以维持较低的开放手术率。

相似文献

1
The impact of extracorporeal piezoelectric lithotripsy on the management of ureteric calculi: an audit.体外压电碎石术对输尿管结石治疗的影响:一项审计
Br J Urol. 1991 Jan;67(1):18-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1991.tb15061.x.
2
Morbidity associated with surgical treatment of ureteric calculi in a teaching hospital in Kuwait.科威特一家教学医院中输尿管结石手术治疗相关的发病率
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2003 Sep;85(5):340-6. doi: 10.1308/003588403769162477.
3
The scope and place of ultrasound-monitored extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in a multimodality setting and the effects of experiential, audit-evoked changes on the management of ureteric calculi.超声监测下体外冲击波碎石术在多模式治疗中的范围及地位,以及经验性、审核引发的变化对输尿管结石治疗的影响。
Br J Urol. 1994 May;73(5):480-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1994.tb07630.x.
4
Primary endoscopic treatment of ureteric calculi. A review of 378 cases.输尿管结石的内镜下主要治疗:378例病例回顾。
Eur Urol. 1999;36(1):48-52. doi: 10.1159/000019926.
5
Antegrade ureterolitholapaxy in the treatment of obstructing or incarcerated proximal ureteric stones.顺行输尿管结石碎石术治疗梗阻性或嵌顿性上段输尿管结石。
Br J Urol. 1990 Feb;65(2):137-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1990.tb14683.x.
6
Management of Proximal Ureteric Stones: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) Versus Ureterorenoscopic Lithotripsy (URSL).近端输尿管结石的治疗:体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与输尿管镜碎石术(URSL)的对比
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2017;15(60):343-346.
7
Laser lithotripsy with the Candela MDL-2000 LaserTripter.使用坎德拉MDL - 2000激光碎石机进行激光碎石术。
Br J Urol. 1993 May;71(5):512-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1993.tb16016.x.
8
The case for primary endoscopic management of upper urinary tract calculi: I. A critical review of 121 extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy failures.上尿路结石的原发性内镜治疗病例:I. 对121例体外冲击波碎石失败病例的批判性回顾
Urology. 1995 Mar;45(3):363-71. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80002-8.
9
The visual endourological removal of ureteric calculi.输尿管结石的可视腔内泌尿外科手术取出术
Med J Aust. 1986;145(11-12):574-9.
10
Retrograde, antegrade, and laparoscopic approaches to the management of large upper ureteral stones after shockwave lithotripsy failure: a four-year retrospective study.冲击波碎石治疗失败后处理大上段输尿管结石的逆行、顺行和腹腔镜方法:一项四年回顾性研究。
J Endourol. 2014 Jan;28(1):100-3. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0391. Epub 2013 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Laser lithotripsy for ureteric calculi: results in 250 patients.输尿管结石的激光碎石术:250例患者的治疗结果
Ulster Med J. 1995 Oct;64(2):126-30.