Suppr超能文献

颈动脉手术中的脑电双频指数变化

Bispectral index changes in carotid surgery.

作者信息

Estruch-Pérez M J, Ausina-Aguilar A, Barberá-Alacreu M, Sánchez-Morillo J, Solaz-Roldán C, Morales-Suárez-Varela M M

机构信息

Anesthesiology and Critical Care Department, Dr. Peset University Hospital, and Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2010 Apr;24(3):393-9. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2009.08.005. Epub 2009 Nov 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative monitoring of cerebral ischemia with shunting during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) remains controversial. Our objective was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of BIS changes during carotid clamping in relation to shunted patients in awake CEA.

METHODS

Eighty CEAs under cervical block were included. There were two patient groups: with clinical signs of cerebral ischemia (shunted patients) and without signs of cerebral ischemia (nonshunted patients). Data were based on bispectral index (BIS) values and neurological monitoring at different surgery time points, with special attention paid during carotid clamping. BIS values were compared between shunted and nonshunted patients. Sensitivity and specificity, along with positive and negative predictive values of a percentage BIS value decrease during carotid clamping from baseline BIS values, were calculated in both patient groups.

RESULTS

Shunting was performed in 11 patients with cerebral ischemia at carotid clamping. Mean BIS values were 82.82+/-11.98 in shunted patients and 92.31+/-5.42 in nonshunted patients at carotid clamping (p<0.001). Relative decreased BIS values in relation to basal BIS values were 13.57% in shunted patients and 3.68% in nonshunted patients (p<0.05). The percentage decrease in BIS was 14%, sensitivity was 81.8% (95% CI 49.9-96.8), and specificity was 89.7% (95% CI 79.3-95.4).

CONCLUSION

BIS monitoring during carotid clamping is an easy, noninvasive method which correlates with cerebral ischemia in patients undergoing CEA. A decrease>or=14% from the basal BIS value presents a high negative predictive value, and ischemia is unlikely without a decrease. Nonetheless, a decrease may not always indicate cerebral ischemia with a low positive predictive value.

摘要

背景

在颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)期间,术中使用分流术监测脑缺血仍存在争议。我们的目的是评估清醒CEA中颈动脉夹闭期间脑电双频指数(BIS)变化对分流患者的敏感性和特异性。

方法

纳入80例在颈丛阻滞下进行的CEA手术。患者分为两组:有脑缺血临床体征的患者(分流患者)和无脑缺血体征的患者(未分流患者)。数据基于不同手术时间点的BIS值和神经监测,尤其关注颈动脉夹闭期间的情况。比较分流患者和未分流患者的BIS值。计算两组患者颈动脉夹闭期间BIS值相对于基线BIS值下降百分比的敏感性、特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值。

结果

11例颈动脉夹闭时出现脑缺血的患者接受了分流术。颈动脉夹闭时,分流患者的平均BIS值为82.82±11.98,未分流患者为92.31±5.42(p<0.001)。相对于基础BIS值,分流患者的BIS值相对下降13.57%,未分流患者为3.68%(p<0.05)。BIS下降百分比为14%,敏感性为81.8%(95%CI 49.9 - 96.8),特异性为89.7%(95%CI 79.3 - 95.4)。

结论

颈动脉夹闭期间的BIS监测是一种简单、无创的方法,与接受CEA手术患者的脑缺血相关。相对于基础BIS值下降≥14%具有较高的阴性预测值,若无下降则缺血可能性不大。然而,下降并不总是表明脑缺血,阳性预测值较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验