Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, USA.
Genetics. 2009 Nov;183(3):767-72. doi: 10.1534/genetics.109.110445.
Most scientific theories, even revolutionary ones, change the practice of a particular science but have few consequences for culture or society at large. But Darwinism, it has often been said, is different in this respect. Since the publication of The Origin of Species, many have claimed that Darwinism has a number of profound social implications. Here, I briefly consider three of these: the economic, the political, and the religious. I suggest that, for the most part, these supposed implications have been misconstrued or exaggerated. Indeed, it is reasonably clear that the chain of implication sometimes primarily ran in the opposite direction-from, for instance, economics and political theory to Darwinism.
大多数科学理论,即使是革命性的理论,也只是改变了特定科学的实践,而对文化或整个社会几乎没有影响。但是,人们常说,达尔文主义在这方面有所不同。自从《物种起源》出版以来,许多人声称达尔文主义具有许多深刻的社会含义。在这里,我简要地考虑了其中的三个方面:经济、政治和宗教。我认为,在大多数情况下,这些所谓的影响被误解或夸大了。事实上,相当明显的是,这种影响的链条有时主要是反向的,例如,从经济学和政治理论到达尔文主义。