欧洲ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死的再灌注治疗:30个国家的现状描述

Reperfusion therapy for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction in Europe: description of the current situation in 30 countries.

作者信息

Widimsky Petr, Wijns William, Fajadet Jean, de Belder Mark, Knot Jiri, Aaberge Lars, Andrikopoulos George, Baz Jose Antonio, Betriu Amadeo, Claeys Marc, Danchin Nicholas, Djambazov Slaveyko, Erne Paul, Hartikainen Juha, Huber Kurt, Kala Petr, Klinceva Milka, Kristensen Steen Dalby, Ludman Peter, Ferre Josephina Mauri, Merkely Bela, Milicic Davor, Morais Joao, Noc Marko, Opolski Grzegorz, Ostojic Miodrag, Radovanovic Dragana, De Servi Stefano, Stenestrand Ulf, Studencan Martin, Tubaro Marco, Vasiljevic Zorana, Weidinger Franz, Witkowski Adam, Zeymer Uwe

机构信息

Cardiocenter, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2010 Apr;31(8):943-57. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp492. Epub 2009 Nov 19.

Abstract

AIMS

Patient access to reperfusion therapy and the use of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI) or thrombolysis (TL) varies considerably between European countries. The aim of this study was to obtain a realistic contemporary picture of how patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are treated in different European countries.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The chairpersons of the national working groups/societies of interventional cardiology in European countries and selected experts known to be involved in the national registries joined the writing group upon invitation. Data were collected about the country and any existing national STEMI or PCI registries, about STEMI epidemiology, and treatment in each given country and about PCI and p-PCI centres and procedures in each country. Results from the national and/or regional registries in 30 countries were included in this analysis. The annual incidence of hospital admission for any acute myocardial infarction (AMI) varied between 90-312/100 thousand/year, the incidence of STEMI alone ranging from 44 to 142. Primary PCI was the dominant reperfusion strategy in 16 countries and TL in 8 countries. The use of a p-PCI strategy varied between 5 and 92% (of all STEMI patients) and the use of TL between 0 and 55%. Any reperfusion treatment (p-PCI or TL) was used in 37-93% of STEMI patients. Significantly less reperfusion therapy was used in those countries where TL was the dominant strategy. The number of p-PCI procedures per million per year varied among countries between 20 and 970. The mean population served by a single p-PCI centre varied between 0.3 and 7.4 million inhabitants. In those countries offering p-PCI services to the majority of their STEMI patients, this population varied between 0.3 and 1.1 million per centre. In-hospital mortality of all consecutive STEMI patients varied between 4.2 and 13.5%, for patients treated by TL between 3.5 and 14% and for patients treated by p-PCI between 2.7 and 8%. The time reported from symptom onset to the first medical contact (FMC) varied between 60 and 210 min, FMC-needle time for TL between 30 and 110 min, and FMC-balloon time for p-PCI between 60 and 177 min.

CONCLUSION

Most North, West, and Central European countries used p-PCI for the majority of their STEMI patients. The lack of organized p-PCI networks was associated with fewer patients overall receiving some form of reperfusion therapy.

摘要

目的

欧洲各国患者接受再灌注治疗以及使用直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(p-PCI)或溶栓治疗(TL)的情况差异很大。本研究的目的是切实了解欧洲不同国家对ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的治疗情况。

方法与结果

欧洲各国介入心脏病学国家工作组/协会主席以及参与国家注册登记的知名专家应邀请加入了写作组。收集了有关国家以及任何现有的国家STEMI或PCI注册登记、STEMI流行病学、每个特定国家的治疗情况以及每个国家的PCI和p-PCI中心及操作的数据。30个国家的国家和/或地区注册登记结果纳入了本分析。任何急性心肌梗死(AMI)的年度住院发病率在90 - 312/10万/年之间,仅STEMI的发病率在44至142之间。16个国家以直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗作为主要的再灌注策略,8个国家以溶栓治疗为主。直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗策略的使用比例在(所有STEMI患者的)5%至92%之间,溶栓治疗的使用比例在0至55%之间。37%至93%的STEMI患者接受了任何再灌注治疗(直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或溶栓治疗)。在以溶栓治疗为主的国家,接受再灌注治疗的患者明显较少。各国每年每百万人口的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗手术数量在20至970之间。每个直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中心服务的平均人口在0.3至740万居民之间。在那些为大多数STEMI患者提供直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗服务的国家,每个中心的服务人口在0.3至110万之间。所有连续STEMI患者的院内死亡率在4.2%至13.5%之间,溶栓治疗患者的死亡率在3.5%至14%之间,直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的死亡率在2.7%至8%之间。报告的症状发作至首次医疗接触(FMC)的时间在60至210分钟之间,溶栓治疗的FMC至穿刺时间在30至110分钟之间,直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的FMC至球囊扩张时间在60至177分钟之间。

结论

大多数北欧、西欧和中欧国家对大多数STEMI患者采用直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。缺乏有组织的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗网络与总体上接受某种形式再灌注治疗的患者较少有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d23e/2854523/70bf8855a352/ehp49201.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索