• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种癌胚抗原免疫测定法的标准化、特异性及诊断敏感性

Standardization, specificity, and diagnostic sensitivity of four immunoassays for carcinoembryonic antigen.

作者信息

Börmer O P

机构信息

Central Laboratory, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo.

出版信息

Clin Chem. 1991 Feb;37(2):231-6.

PMID:1993329
Abstract

Four "sandwich"-type immunoassays for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) based on monoclonal antibodies (Abbott CEA-RIA Monoclonal, Pharmacia/Wallac Delfia CEA kit, Roche CEA EIA Duomab 60, and our in-house immunoradiometric assay) were compared for 357 samples from colorectal cancer patients and samples from 48 patients with chronic liver disease or with acute, irrelevant diseases. Relative to a common 5 micrograms/L reference limit, all four assays agreed regarding classification in 92% to 94% of the samples in the colorectal cancer samples, with the Abbott and Roche assays giving slightly more "normal" values. Cross-testing of CEA standards and the 1st International Reference Preparation 73/601 showed that calibration differences could not be eliminated by the use of a common standard. It has been earlier demonstrated that the monoclonal antibodies in the Roche assay have an epitope group specificity slightly different from those of the other three assays. This can explain why the correlations involving the Roche assay were weaker (r = 0.84-0.87) than those obtained with the other assays (r = 0.94-0.97). I conclude that agreement between the assays studied is as good as can be expected when different antibodies are used; nevertheless, consistent discrepancies between assays in several patients still necessitate the use of the same assay during follow-up.

摘要

对来自结肠直肠癌患者的357份样本以及48例患有慢性肝病或急性无关疾病患者的样本,比较了四种基于单克隆抗体的癌胚抗原(CEA)“三明治”式免疫测定法(雅培CEA-RIA单克隆法、法玛西亚/瓦里安Delfia CEA试剂盒、罗氏CEA EIA Duomab 60以及我们内部的免疫放射测定法)。相对于5微克/升的通用参考限值,在结肠直肠癌样本中,92%至94%的样本在四种测定法的分类结果上是一致的,雅培和罗氏测定法给出的“正常”值略多。对CEA标准品和第一国际参考制剂73/601进行交叉检测表明,使用通用标准无法消除校准差异。此前已经证明,罗氏测定法中的单克隆抗体具有与其他三种测定法略有不同的表位组特异性。这可以解释为什么涉及罗氏测定法的相关性(r = 0.84 - 0.87)比其他测定法(r = 0.94 - 0.97)得到的相关性弱。我的结论是,当使用不同抗体时,所研究的测定法之间的一致性达到了预期的良好程度;然而,在一些患者中测定法之间持续存在的差异仍然使得在随访期间必须使用相同的测定法。

相似文献

1
Standardization, specificity, and diagnostic sensitivity of four immunoassays for carcinoembryonic antigen.四种癌胚抗原免疫测定法的标准化、特异性及诊断敏感性
Clin Chem. 1991 Feb;37(2):231-6.
2
Major disagreements between immunoassays of carcinoembryonic antigen may be caused by nonspecific cross-reacting antigen 2 (NCA-2).癌胚抗原免疫测定之间的主要差异可能由非特异性交叉反应抗原2(NCA-2)引起。
Clin Chem. 1991 Oct;37(10 Pt 1):1736-9.
3
Epitope group specificity of six immunoassays for carcinoembryonic antigen.六种癌胚抗原免疫测定法的表位组特异性
Tumour Biol. 1991;12(1):9-15. doi: 10.1159/000217682.
4
EIA versus RIA in detecting carcinoembryonic antigen level of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.酶免疫分析与放射免疫分析检测转移性结直肠癌患者癌胚抗原水平的比较
Hepatogastroenterology. 2004 Jan-Feb;51(55):136-41.
5
Two monoclonal-based assays for carcinoembryonic antigen compared.
Clin Chem. 1987 May;33(5):700-4.
6
Comparison of RIA and IRMA methods for measurement of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA).
Clin Biochem. 1982 Oct;15(5):241-7. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9120(82)97007-2.
7
Roche RIA and Abbott EIA carcinoembryonic antigen assays compared.罗氏放射免疫分析与雅培酶免疫分析癌胚抗原检测的比较
Clin Chem. 1984 Feb;30(2):200-5.
8
Solving the problem of antibody interference in commercial "sandwich"-type immunoassays of carcinoembryonic antigen.解决商业“夹心”型癌胚抗原免疫分析中抗体干扰问题。
Clin Chem. 1989 Jan;35(1):146-51.
9
Comparison of a CEA-EIA assay based on monoclonal antibody with a CEA-RIA assay with polyclonal antiserum.基于单克隆抗体的癌胚抗原酶免疫分析与基于多克隆抗血清的癌胚抗原放射免疫分析的比较。
NIPH Ann. 1985 Jun;8(1):13-26.
10
Comparison of Four Automated Carcinoembryonic Antigen Immunoassays: ADVIA Centaur XP, ARCHITECT I2000sr, Elecsys E170, and Unicel Dxi800.四种自动癌胚抗原免疫分析的比较:ADVIA Centaur XP、ARCHITECT I2000sr、Elecsys E170 和 Unicel Dxi800。
Ann Lab Med. 2018 Jul;38(4):355-361. doi: 10.3343/alm.2018.38.4.355.

引用本文的文献

1
Circulating Biomarkers of Thyroid Cancer: An Appraisal.甲状腺癌的循环生物标志物:评估
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 26;14(5):1582. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051582.
2
Accurate method for value assignment of carcinoembryonic antigen reference materials.癌胚抗原参考物质赋值的准确方法。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2023 Jun;37(11-12):e24936. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24936. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
3
Longitudinal Evaluation of AFP and CEA External Proficiency Testing Reveals Need for Method Harmonization.甲胎蛋白(AFP)和癌胚抗原(CEA)外部能力验证的纵向评估显示需要方法协调统一。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 9;13(12):2019. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13122019.
4
ΔNp73, TAp73 and Δ133p53 Extracellular Vesicle Cargo as Early Diagnosis Markers in Colorectal Cancer.ΔNp73、TAp73和Δ133p53作为细胞外囊泡货物在结直肠癌早期诊断中的标志物
Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 7;13(9):2240. doi: 10.3390/cancers13092240.
5
Blood CEA levels for detecting recurrent colorectal cancer.用于检测复发性结直肠癌的血液癌胚抗原水平。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 10;2015(12):CD011134. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011134.pub2.