Suppr超能文献

全膝关节置换术中胫骨组件放置的髓内和髓外对线系统比较

A comparison of intramedullary and extramedullary alignment systems for tibial component placement in total knee arthroplasty.

作者信息

Brys D A, Lombardi A V, Mallory T H, Vaughn B K

机构信息

Saint Anthony Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991 Feb(263):175-9.

PMID:1993372
Abstract

Fifty-two primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) using an intramedullary tibial jigging system to obtain ideal tibial alignment (90 degrees +/- 2 degrees) were compared with 62 TKAs using an extramedullary tibial jigging system. The Insall-Burstein total knee system was used in all cases, and all femoral components were positioned with extramedullary jigs. Postoperative evaluation consisted of a standing, hip-to-ankle anteroposterior roentgenogram and measurement of the following angles: (1) femorotibial, (2) tibial component, (3) femoral component, and (4) mechanical axis. Ideal tibial component alignment using the intramedullary system was statistically superior to alignment achieved with the extramedullary system. All other angle comparisons showed no statistical significance.

摘要

将使用髓内胫骨定位系统以获得理想胫骨对线(90度±2度)的52例初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)与使用髓外胫骨定位系统的62例TKA进行比较。所有病例均使用Insall-Burstein全膝关节系统,所有股骨组件均使用髓外夹具定位。术后评估包括站立位髋至踝前后位X线片以及以下角度的测量:(1)股胫角,(2)胫骨组件角度,(3)股骨组件角度,以及(4)机械轴。使用髓内系统时理想的胫骨组件对线在统计学上优于使用髓外系统时的对线。所有其他角度比较均无统计学意义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验