Brys D A, Lombardi A V, Mallory T H, Vaughn B K
Saint Anthony Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991 Feb(263):175-9.
Fifty-two primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) using an intramedullary tibial jigging system to obtain ideal tibial alignment (90 degrees +/- 2 degrees) were compared with 62 TKAs using an extramedullary tibial jigging system. The Insall-Burstein total knee system was used in all cases, and all femoral components were positioned with extramedullary jigs. Postoperative evaluation consisted of a standing, hip-to-ankle anteroposterior roentgenogram and measurement of the following angles: (1) femorotibial, (2) tibial component, (3) femoral component, and (4) mechanical axis. Ideal tibial component alignment using the intramedullary system was statistically superior to alignment achieved with the extramedullary system. All other angle comparisons showed no statistical significance.
将使用髓内胫骨定位系统以获得理想胫骨对线(90度±2度)的52例初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)与使用髓外胫骨定位系统的62例TKA进行比较。所有病例均使用Insall-Burstein全膝关节系统,所有股骨组件均使用髓外夹具定位。术后评估包括站立位髋至踝前后位X线片以及以下角度的测量:(1)股胫角,(2)胫骨组件角度,(3)股骨组件角度,以及(4)机械轴。使用髓内系统时理想的胫骨组件对线在统计学上优于使用髓外系统时的对线。所有其他角度比较均无统计学意义。