• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无段落理解能力测试:大学生的表现明显优于随机水平。

Passageless comprehension on the Nelson-Denny reading test: well above chance for university students.

机构信息

University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.

出版信息

J Learn Disabil. 2010 May-Jun;43(3):244-9. doi: 10.1177/0022219409345017. Epub 2009 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1177/0022219409345017
PMID:19933897
Abstract

The comprehension section of the Nelson-Denny Reading Test (NDRT) is widely used to assess the reading comprehension skills of adolescents and adults in the United States. In this study, the authors explored the content validity of the NDRT Comprehension Test (Forms G and H) by asking university students (with and without at-risk status for learning disorders) to answer the multiple-choice comprehension questions without reading the passages. Overall accuracy rates were well above chance for both NDRT forms and both groups of students. These results raise serious questions about the validity of the NDRT and its use in the identification of reading disabilities.

摘要

纳尔逊-丹尼阅读测试(Nelson-Denny Reading Test,简称 NDRT)的理解部分在美国被广泛用于评估青少年和成年人的阅读理解能力。在这项研究中,作者通过让大学生(有或没有学习障碍风险的)在不阅读文章的情况下回答多项选择题,来探讨 NDRT 阅读理解测试(形式 G 和 H)的内容效度。两种 NDRT 形式和两组学生的整体准确率都远高于随机水平。这些结果对 NDRT 的有效性及其在阅读障碍识别中的应用提出了严重质疑。

相似文献

1
Passageless comprehension on the Nelson-Denny reading test: well above chance for university students.无段落理解能力测试:大学生的表现明显优于随机水平。
J Learn Disabil. 2010 May-Jun;43(3):244-9. doi: 10.1177/0022219409345017. Epub 2009 Nov 23.
2
"Passageless" administration of the Nelson-Denny Reading Comprehension Test: associations with IQ and reading skills.无篇章阅读理解测验的“无篇章”施测:与智商和阅读技能的关联。
J Learn Disabil. 2013 Jul-Aug;46(4):377-84. doi: 10.1177/0022219412468160. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
3
Exploring dynamic assessment as a means of identifying children at risk of developing comprehension difficulties.探索动态评估作为识别有发展阅读理解困难风险的儿童的一种方法。
J Learn Disabil. 2011 Jul-Aug;44(4):348-57. doi: 10.1177/0022219411407865. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
4
Perceptual organization, phonological awareness, and reading comprehension in adults with and without learning disabilities.具有和不具有学习障碍的成年人在知觉组织、语音意识和阅读理解方面的比较。
Ann Dyslexia. 2010 Dec;60(2):209-37. doi: 10.1007/s11881-010-0042-9. Epub 2010 Sep 14.
5
The effect of extra time on reading comprehension scores for university students with and without learning disabilities.额外时间对有学习障碍和无学习障碍的大学生阅读理解成绩的影响。
J Learn Disabil. 1991 Feb;24(2):104-8. doi: 10.1177/002221949102400207.
6
Lateralization of temporal lobe epilepsy and learning disabilities, as defined by disability-related civil rights law.颞叶癫痫的偏侧化与学习障碍,这是由与残疾相关的民权法所定义的。
Epilepsia. 2004 Aug;45(8):963-70. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.29803.x.
7
The reading comprehension abilities of dyslexic students in higher education.高等教育中阅读障碍学生的阅读理解能力。
Dyslexia. 2000 Jul-Sep;6(3):178-92. doi: 10.1002/1099-0909(200007/09)6:3<178::AID-DYS171>3.0.CO;2-9.
8
Harmful effects of preexisting inappropriate highlighting on reading comprehension and metacognitive accuracy.先前不恰当的突出显示对阅读理解和元认知准确性的有害影响。
J Gen Psychol. 2009 Jul;136(3):287-300. doi: 10.3200/GENP.136.3.287-302.
9
Assessing college-level learning difficulties and "at riskness" for learning disabilities and ADHD: development and validation of the learning difficulties assessment.评估大学生学习困难和学习障碍及 ADHD 的“风险”:学习困难评估的开发与验证。
J Learn Disabil. 2011 Nov-Dec;44(6):533-42. doi: 10.1177/0022219410392045. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
10
Which tasks best discriminate between dyslexic university students and controls in a transparent language?哪些任务最能在透明语言中区分诵读困难的大学生和对照组?
Dyslexia. 2011 Aug;17(3):227-41. doi: 10.1002/dys.431.

引用本文的文献

1
The jingle fallacy in comprehension tests for reading.理解测试中朗朗上口的谬误——阅读篇
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 5;19(7):e0306466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306466. eCollection 2024.
2
Individual differences and the transposed letter effect during reading.阅读过程中的个体差异和字母置换效应。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 28;19(2):e0298351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298351. eCollection 2024.
3
Stop Worrying about Multiple-Choice: Fact Knowledge Does Not Change with Response Format.别再担心多项选择题了:事实性知识不会因答题格式而改变。
J Intell. 2022 Nov 14;10(4):102. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10040102.
4
Validated tests for language research with university students whose native language is English: Tests of vocabulary, general knowledge, author recognition, and reading comprehension.针对以英语为母语的大学生进行语言研究的有效测试:词汇测试、一般知识测试、作者识别测试和阅读理解测试。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Apr;55(3):1036-1068. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01856-x. Epub 2022 May 16.
5
Understanding the Influence of Text Complexity and Question Type on Reading Outcomes.理解文本复杂度和问题类型对阅读结果的影响。
Read Writ. 2019 Mar;32(3):603-637. doi: 10.1007/s11145-018-9883-0. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
6
Dough, tough, cough, rough: A "fast" fMRI localizer of component processes in reading.面团、坚硬的、咳嗽、粗糙的:一种用于阅读中成分加工的“快速”功能磁共振成像定位器。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Oct;91:394-406. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.08.027. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
7
Reading comprehension in children with ADHD: cognitive underpinnings of the centrality deficit.ADHD 儿童的阅读理解:中心缺陷的认知基础。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2013 Apr;41(3):473-83. doi: 10.1007/s10802-012-9686-8.
8
Understanding the centrality deficit: insight from foreign language learners.理解中心缺失:外语学习者的启示。
Mem Cognit. 2011 Jul;39(5):873-83. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0062-z.