Vanderbilt University, Department of Special Education, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 2011 Jul-Aug;44(4):348-57. doi: 10.1177/0022219411407865. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
In this study, the authors explore a newly constructed dynamic assessment (DA) intended to tap inference-making skills that they hypothesize will be predictive of future comprehension performance. The authors administered the test to 100 second-grade children using a dynamic format to consider the concurrent validity of the measure. The dynamic portion of the assessment comprised teaching children to be "reading detectives" by using textual clues to solve what was happening in the story. During the DA children listened to short passages and answered three inferential questions (i.e., one setting, two causal). If children were unable to answer a question, they were reminded what a reading detective would do and given a set of increasingly concrete prompts and clues to orient them to the relevant portion of text until they could answer the question correctly. Results showed that the DA correlated significantly with a standardized measure of reading comprehension and explained a small but significant amount of unique variance in reading comprehension above and beyond vocabulary and word identification skills. In addition, results suggest that DA may be better than the standardized measure of reading comprehension at identifying intraindividual differences in young children's reading abilities.
在这项研究中,作者探索了一种新构建的动态评估(DA),旨在挖掘他们假设的推理技能,这些技能将预测未来的阅读理解表现。作者使用动态格式对 100 名二年级儿童进行了测试,以考虑该测量的同时效度。评估的动态部分包括通过使用文本线索教儿童成为“阅读侦探”,以解决故事中发生的事情。在 DA 中,孩子们听短文并回答三个推理问题(即一个设置,两个因果)。如果孩子无法回答问题,他们会被提醒阅读侦探会做什么,并提供一组越来越具体的提示和线索,帮助他们定位到相关文本部分,直到他们能够正确回答问题。结果表明,DA 与阅读理解的标准化测量显著相关,并解释了在词汇和单词识别技能之外,阅读理解中一个小但显著的独特差异。此外,结果表明,DA 可能比阅读理解的标准化测量更能识别幼儿阅读能力的个体内差异。