Suppr超能文献

脉冲电磁场治疗对压疮愈合的疗效:一项随机对照试验。

Efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in healing of pressure ulcers: A randomized control trial.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatric & Neurological Rehabilitation, National Institute of Mental Health & Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

Neurol India. 2009 Sep-Oct;57(5):622-6. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.57820.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pressure ulcers are one of the most common complications in health care settings. Still there are no optimal protocols to manage the pressure ulcers.

AIM

To assess the effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) in healing of pressure ulcers in patients with neurological disorders.

DESIGN

Randomized double blind control trial.

SETTING

Neurological rehabilitation department in a university research hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Twelve patients (M:F, 9:3) having neurological disorders, with age between 12-50 years (mean 30.166 +/- 11.32 yrs) and 24 pressure ulcers.

INTERVENTION

Six patients with 13 ulcers received PEMF therapy and the remaining 6 patients with 11 ulcers received sham treatment, for 30 sessions (45 minutes each) using the equipment 'Pulsatron'. The frequency of PEMF was set at 1 Hz with sine waves and current intensity of 30 mili ampere. Whole body exposure was given in both the groups.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Bates-Jensen wound assessment tool (BJWAT) score was used as main outcome measure and scores at the end of session were compared with initial scores and analyzed. Similarly National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) scores were compared and analyzed as secondary outcome measure.

RESULTS

Thirteen ulcers were in stage IV and 11 were in stage III at the start of the study. Significant healing of ulcers was noted, BJWAT scores, in both the treatment and sham groups (P < 0.001 and 0.003 respectively) at the completion of the study. However, when comparing between the groups, healing was not significant (P = 0.361). Similarly trend was noted with NPUAP scores with no significant difference between the treatment and sham groups (P = 0.649) at the completion of study.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference in pressure ulcer healing was observed between PEMF treatment and sham group in this study.

摘要

背景

压疮是医疗保健环境中最常见的并发症之一。尽管如此,目前仍没有最佳的方案来处理压疮。

目的

评估脉冲电磁场疗法(PEMF)治疗神经障碍患者压疮的效果。

设计

随机双盲对照试验。

地点

大学附属医院的神经康复科。

参与者

12 名(男/女,9/3)患有神经障碍的患者,年龄在 12-50 岁之间(平均 30.166 ± 11.32 岁),共有 24 个压疮。

干预

6 名患者(13 个溃疡)接受 PEMF 治疗,其余 6 名患者(11 个溃疡)接受假治疗,使用设备“Pulsatron”进行 30 次治疗(每次 45 分钟)。PEMF 的频率设定为 1Hz 的正弦波,电流强度为 30 毫安。两组均采用全身暴露。

结果测量

主要结果测量使用 Bates-Jensen 伤口评估工具(BJWAT)评分,比较结束时的评分与初始评分,并进行分析。同样,将国家压疮咨询小组(NPUAP)评分作为次要结果测量进行比较和分析。

结果

研究开始时,13 个溃疡处于 IV 期,11 个溃疡处于 III 期。治疗和假治疗组的溃疡均有明显愈合,BJWAT 评分(分别为 P < 0.001 和 0.003)在研究结束时。然而,当比较两组时,愈合没有显著差异(P = 0.361)。同样,NPUAP 评分也有类似的趋势,治疗组和假治疗组之间没有显著差异(P = 0.649)。

结论

本研究中,PEMF 治疗与假治疗组在压疮愈合方面无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验