Adunsky Abraham, Ohry Avi
Department of Geriatric Medicine, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer 52621, Israel.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2005 Nov-Dec;41(3):261-9. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2005.04.004. Epub 2005 Jul 5.
Electrostimulation for the treatment of pressure sores remains problematic and controversial. We studied the decubitus direct current treatment (DDCT) electrostimulation treatment of pressure sores stage 3 degree, with respect to rates of ulcer closure and wound area reduction. This was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study involving 11 departments of geriatric and rehabilitation medicine including 63 patients. We compared a placebo treated group (PG) with an active treatment group (TG). Treatment lasted for 8 consecutive weeks, followed by a 12-week-period of follow-up. At day 57 (end of treatment) and at day 147 (end of follow-up), there was no difference between the groups with regards to rates of complete closure of ulcers (p=0.28 and 0.39, respectively), as well as for the mean time needed to achieve complete wound closure (p=0.16). Absolute ulcer area reduction and speed rate of wound area reduction (reflected by change from baseline ulcer area, percentage) were better in participants allocated in the treatment group only until day 45 (standardized estimate for trend of healing speed -0.44 and -0.14 for TG and PG, respectively). Afterwards, there were no differences between the two groups. A logistic regression analysis favored complete healing in TG, compared with PG (odds ratio 1.6, CI 0.4-4.73). Analysis of per protocol patients revealed that time needed for wound closure was 52% longer in PG (p=0.03, compared with TG). The results suggest that DDCT treatment for pressure ulcers grade 3 degree, in addition to the conservative wound care, may be useful in accelerating the healing process during the first period of care.
电刺激用于治疗压疮仍然存在问题且存在争议。我们研究了褥疮直流电治疗(DDCT)对3度压疮的电刺激治疗效果,观察溃疡愈合率和伤口面积缩小情况。这是一项多中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究,涉及11个老年医学和康复医学科室的63名患者。我们将安慰剂治疗组(PG)与积极治疗组(TG)进行了比较。治疗持续8周,随后进行12周的随访。在第57天(治疗结束时)和第147天(随访结束时),两组在溃疡完全愈合率方面没有差异(分别为p = 0.28和0.39),在实现伤口完全愈合所需的平均时间方面也没有差异(p = 0.16)。仅在第45天之前,治疗组患者的绝对溃疡面积缩小和伤口面积缩小速度(以溃疡面积相对于基线的变化百分比反映)优于安慰剂组(TG和PG的愈合速度标准化趋势估计值分别为-0.44和-0.14)。之后,两组之间没有差异。逻辑回归分析显示,与PG相比,TG更有利于完全愈合(优势比1.6,CI 0.4 - 4.73)。符合方案患者的分析表明,PG伤口愈合所需时间比TG长52%(与TG相比,p = 0.03)。结果表明,除了保守的伤口护理外,DDCT治疗3度压疮在护理的第一阶段可能有助于加速愈合过程。