Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Unit, CHU-Tivoli, La Louviere, Belgium.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Mar;27(3):295-9. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283315ad0.
Replacing mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) monitoring by central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) monitoring in order to avoid the use of a pulmonary artery catheter and its related complications is still controversial in the setting of cardiac surgery. The influence of surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass and anaesthesia drugs on the relationship between SvO2 and ScvO2 has never been studied.
Fifteen patients scheduled for cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were included in the study. SvO2 (from the pulmonary artery) and ScvO2 (from the superior vena cava) were continuously measured with fibre-optic catheters from induction of anaesthesia to 24 h postoperatively.
A total of 9267 pairs of measurements were recorded. Mean bias between SvO2 and ScvO2 was 4.4% with limits of agreement of -13.6 and +22.5%, respectively. Trends of SvO2 and ScvO2 values followed very different patterns for some patients. Surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass and anaesthesia drugs did not influence the relationship between the two methods.
Because of the large interindividual variability in the difference between SvO2 and ScvO2, the measure of ScvO2 should not replace the measure of SvO2 with a pulmonary artery catheter for the management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.
在心脏外科手术中,为避免使用肺动脉导管及其相关并发症,用中心静脉血氧饱和度(ScvO2)监测替代混合静脉血氧饱和度(SvO2)监测仍存在争议。手术、体外循环和麻醉药物对 SvO2 与 ScvO2 之间关系的影响从未被研究过。
本研究纳入了 15 例行体外循环心脏手术的患者。从麻醉诱导到术后 24 小时,连续使用光纤导管测量 SvO2(来自肺动脉)和 ScvO2(来自上腔静脉)。
共记录了 9267 对测量值。SvO2 和 ScvO2 之间的平均偏差为 4.4%,一致性界限分别为-13.6%和+22.5%。对于一些患者,SvO2 和 ScvO2 值的趋势呈现出非常不同的模式。手术、体外循环和麻醉药物并不影响这两种方法之间的关系。
由于 SvO2 和 ScvO2 之间的差异存在很大的个体间变异性,因此在进行体外循环心脏手术的患者管理中,不应使用 ScvO2 替代肺动脉导管来测量 SvO2。