Squara Pierre
Crit Care. 2014 Nov 10;18(6):579. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0579-9.
Central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) >70% or mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) >65% is recommended for both septic and non-septic patients. Although it is the task of experts to suggest clear and simple guidelines, there is a risk of reducing critical care to these simple recommendations. This article reviews the basic physiological and pathological features as well as the metrological issues that provide clear evidence that SvO2 and ScvO2 are adaptative variables with large inter-patient variability. This variability is exemplified in a modeled population of 1,000 standard ICU patients and in a real population of 100 patients including 15,860 measurements. In these populations, it can be seen how optimizing one to three of the four S(c)vO2 components homogenized the patients and yields a clear dependency with the fourth one. This explains the discordant results observed in large studies where cardiac output was increased up to predetermined S(c)vO2 thresholds following arterial oxygen hemoglobin saturation, total body oxygen consumption needs and hemoglobin optimization. Although a systematic S(c)vO2 goal-oriented protocol can be statistically profitable before ICU admission, appropriate intensive care mandates determination of the best compromise between S(c)vO2 and its four components, taking into account the specific constraints of each individual patient.
对于脓毒症和非脓毒症患者,建议中心静脉血氧饱和度(ScvO2)>70%或混合静脉血氧饱和度(SvO2)>65%。尽管提出清晰简单的指南是专家的任务,但存在将重症监护简化为这些简单建议的风险。本文回顾了基本的生理和病理特征以及计量问题,这些问题提供了明确证据,表明SvO2和ScvO2是具有较大患者间变异性的适应性变量。这种变异性在一个由1000名标准ICU患者组成的模拟人群以及一个由100名患者组成的真实人群(包含15860次测量)中得到体现。在这些人群中,可以看到如何优化四个S(c)vO2组成部分中的一至三个能使患者同质化,并与第四个组成部分产生明显的相关性。这解释了在大型研究中观察到的不一致结果,即在动脉血氧血红蛋白饱和度、全身氧消耗需求和血红蛋白优化后,心输出量增加至预定的S(c)vO2阈值。尽管在ICU入院前,系统的以S(c)vO2为目标的方案在统计学上可能有益,但适当的重症监护要求在考虑每个患者的具体限制因素的情况下,确定S(c)vO2与其四个组成部分之间的最佳平衡。