Calandre Elena P, Garcia-Leiva Juan M, Rico-Villademoros Fernando, Vilchez Juan S, Rodriguez-Lopez Carmen M
Instituto de Neurociencias, Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas (CIBM), Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Clin Neuropharmacol. 2010 Jan-Feb;33(1):35-9. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0b013e3181bf1dbe.
Studies concerning the prophylactic treatment of chronic migraine are scarce, with topiramate being the most thoroughly studied drug at this respect. The aim of our study was to assess if pregabalin could be useful in the preventive management of chronic migraine.
Thirty consecutive chronic migraine patients, 24 women and 6 men, aged 24 to 75 years and not receiving any other prophylactic medication, were treated with pregabalin for 12 weeks. The initial daily dosage was 75 mg, subsequently adjusted according to the drug's efficacy and the individual patients' tolerability at 2-week intervals. Patients kept a headache diary from 4 weeks before drug administration until the study ended, and headache impact test (HIT-6) was administered at baseline and at 4-week intervals. The main outcome variable was the change from baseline to end point in headache frequency. The secondary outcome variables included changes in headache severity, rescue medication intake, HIT-6 scores, and adverse reactions to pregabalin.
Pregabalin treatment was associated to significant decreases in headache frequency (P < 0.0001) and severity (P = 0.0005), rescue medication intake (P < 0.0001), and HIT-6 scores (P < 0.0001). Patients with daily headache performed worse than those with nondaily headache, showing no change in headache frequency and less relevant reduction of HIT-6 scores. The most frequent adverse reactions were dizziness (40%), somnolence (29%), abnormal thinking (16.7%), constipation and fatigue (13.3%).
Despite the limitations of an open-label design, our data suggest that pregabalin may be a useful alternative prophylaxis for chronic migraine. These promising results should be confirmed in randomized clinical trials.
关于慢性偏头痛预防性治疗的研究较少,在这方面托吡酯是研究最充分的药物。我们研究的目的是评估普瑞巴林在慢性偏头痛预防性治疗中是否有用。
连续纳入30例慢性偏头痛患者,其中24例女性,6例男性,年龄24至75岁,未接受任何其他预防性药物治疗,给予普瑞巴林治疗12周。初始日剂量为75mg,随后根据药物疗效和个体患者耐受性每2周调整一次。患者在给药前4周直至研究结束记录头痛日记,并在基线及每4周进行一次头痛影响测试(HIT-6)。主要结局变量是头痛频率从基线到终点的变化。次要结局变量包括头痛严重程度、急救药物摄入量、HIT-6评分以及对普瑞巴林的不良反应的变化。
普瑞巴林治疗与头痛频率(P<0.0001)、严重程度(P = 0.0005)、急救药物摄入量(P<0.0001)和HIT-6评分(P<0.0001)的显著降低相关。每日头痛患者的治疗效果比非每日头痛患者差,头痛频率无变化,HIT-6评分降低幅度较小。最常见的不良反应是头晕(40%)、嗜睡(29%)、思维异常(16.7%)、便秘和疲劳(13.3%)。
尽管开放标签设计存在局限性,但我们的数据表明普瑞巴林可能是慢性偏头痛预防性治疗的一种有用替代药物。这些有前景的结果应在随机临床试验中得到证实。