Truyers Carla, Kellen Eliane, Arbyn Marc, Trommelmans Leen, Nys Herman, Hensen Karen, Aertgeerts Bert, Bartholomeeusen Stefaan, Hansson Mats, Buntinx Frank
Department of General Practice, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, Blok j, bus 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Med Health Care Philos. 2010 May;13(2):169-75. doi: 10.1007/s11019-009-9230-y.
This paper discusses the legal implications of setting up two new biobanks in Belgium. The first is hospital-based and will archive tissue from patients with haematologic cancer, whereas the second is linked to a general practice based morbidity registry and will involve storage of blood samples. To date, Belgium has no specific legislation that regulates storage of human tissue and related databases. Several issues concerning the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal medical data are discussed from the existing privacy legislation. We will address the principle of consent (broad versus specific) and the type of data recorded (anonymous, encoded and identifiable) for both biobanks.
本文讨论了在比利时建立两个新生物样本库的法律影响。第一个是以医院为基础的,将存档血液系统癌症患者的组织,而第二个与基于全科医疗的发病率登记处相关联,将涉及血液样本的存储。迄今为止,比利时没有规范人体组织存储及相关数据库的具体立法。我们从现有的隐私立法出发,讨论了在个人医疗数据处理方面保护个人的若干问题。我们将探讨两个生物样本库的同意原则(广义与特定)以及所记录数据的类型(匿名、编码和可识别)。