Suppr超能文献

采用E-test法对流感嗜血杆菌和肺炎链球菌进行定量抗菌药物敏感性试验。

Quantitative antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae by using the E-test.

作者信息

Jorgensen J H, Howell A W, Maher L A

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78284-7750.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Jan;29(1):109-14. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.1.109-114.1991.

Abstract

The E-test (PDM Epsilometer; AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) is an antimicrobial agent gradient-coated plastic test strip which allows MIC determinations on agar media. The test is performed in a manner similar to the agar disk diffusion procedure. A collection of Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae strains possessing various resistance mechanisms was used to evaluate the E-test method. H. influenzae strains were tested with both Haemophilus test medium (HTM) and PDM ASM II chocolate agar, while the S. pneumoniae strains were tested on Mueller-Hinton sheep blood agar. E-test MICs for a total of 10 antimicrobial agents were compared with broth microdilution MICs determined according to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards methods. In general, E-test MICs for both species were quickly and easily interpreted and agreed within one log2 MIC increment in 89.8% of tests with H. influenzae and in 80.4% of pneumococcal tests. The majority of disagreements between the E-test and conventional MICs occurred with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole because of trailing and diffuse E-test MIC endpoints with both species. Ampicillin MICs for beta-lactamase-producing H. influenzae determined by the E-test differed at times from those determined by conventional testing because of the vagaries of interpreting colonies growing within the E-test inhibition ellipses. E-test penicillin MICs for pneumococci tended to be 1 to 2 log2 dilutions lower than those determined by using Mueller-Hinton broth supplemented with lysed horse blood. Nevertheless, strains of both species with documented resistance to the study drugs were detected by E-tests, i.e., 0.7% of the tests had very major errors with H. influenzae and 0.8% had very major errors with S. pneumoniae. Thus, the E-test represents a potential alternative method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of these two fastidious bacterial species.

摘要

E试验(PDM药敏试验仪;AB生物磁盘公司,瑞典索尔纳)是一种涂有抗菌剂梯度的塑料测试条,可在琼脂培养基上进行最低抑菌浓度(MIC)测定。该试验的操作方式与琼脂纸片扩散法类似。使用一组具有各种耐药机制的流感嗜血杆菌和肺炎链球菌菌株来评估E试验方法。流感嗜血杆菌菌株在嗜血杆菌试验培养基(HTM)和PDM ASM II巧克力琼脂上进行测试,而肺炎链球菌菌株在穆勒-欣顿羊血琼脂上进行测试。将总共10种抗菌剂的E试验MIC与根据美国国家临床实验室标准委员会方法测定的肉汤微量稀释MIC进行比较。总体而言,两种细菌的E试验MIC都能快速且容易地解读,在89.8%的流感嗜血杆菌试验和80.4%的肺炎链球菌试验中,两者在一个log2 MIC增量范围内相符。E试验与传统MIC之间的大多数差异出现在甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑上,这是因为两种细菌的E试验MIC终点出现拖尾和弥散现象。对于产β-内酰胺酶的流感嗜血杆菌,E试验测定的氨苄西林MIC有时与传统测试测定的结果不同,这是由于解读E试验抑菌椭圆内生长的菌落存在不确定性。肺炎链球菌的E试验青霉素MIC往往比使用补充有溶血马血的穆勒-欣顿肉汤测定的结果低1至2个log2稀释度。然而,E试验能检测出两种细菌中对研究药物有耐药记录的菌株,即0.7%的流感嗜血杆菌试验有非常重大误差,0.8%的肺炎链球菌试验有非常重大误差。因此,E试验是这两种苛养细菌抗菌药敏试验的一种潜在替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb90/269713/73ebf4361c16/jcm00037-0132-a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验