Royal Free Sheila Sherlock Liver Centre, Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Liver Transpl. 2009 Dec;15(12):1783-91. doi: 10.1002/lt.21907.
Less potent immunosuppression is considered to reduce the severity of hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after liver transplantation. An optimal regimen is unknown. We evaluated tacrolimus monotherapy versus triple therapy in a randomized trial of 103 first transplants for HCV cirrhosis. One hundred three patients who underwent transplantation for HCV were randomized to tacrolimus monotherapy (n = 54) or triple therapy with tacrolimus, azathioprine, and steroids (n = 49), which were tapered to zero by 3 to 6 months. Both groups had serial transjugular biopsies with hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement. The time to reach Ishak stage 4 was the predetermined endpoint. All factors documented in the literature as being associated with HCV recurrence and the allocated treatment were evaluated for reaching stage 4 and HVPG >or= 10 mm Hg. No significant preoperative, perioperative, or postoperative differences, including the frequency of biopsies between groups, were found. During a mean follow-up of 53.5 months, 9 monotherapy patients and 6 triple therapy patients died, and 5 monotherapy patients and 4 triple therapy patients underwent retransplantation. Stage 4 fibrosis was reached in 17 monotherapy patients and 10 triple therapy patients (P = 0.04), with slower fibrosis progression in the triple therapy patients (P = 0.048). Allocated therapy and histological acute hepatitis were independently associated with stage 4 fibrosis. HVPG increased to >or=10 mm Hg more rapidly in monotherapy patients versus triple therapy patients (P = 0.038). In conclusion, long-term maintenance immunosuppression with azathioprine and shorter term prednisolone with tacrolimus in HCV cirrhosis recipients resulted in a slower onset of histologically proven severe fibrosis and portal hypertension in comparison with tacrolimus alone, and this was independent of known factors affecting fibrosis.
在肝移植后,较弱的免疫抑制被认为可以降低丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)复发的严重程度。但最佳方案尚不清楚。我们在一项随机试验中评估了他克莫司单药治疗与三联疗法在丙型肝炎肝硬化首次移植中的作用。103 例丙型肝炎肝移植患者随机分为他克莫司单药治疗组(n = 54)或他克莫司、硫唑嘌呤和类固醇三联疗法组(n = 49),两组均在 3 至 6 个月内逐渐停药至零。两组均进行经颈静脉肝活检和肝静脉压力梯度(HVPG)测量。达到 Ishak 4 期的时间是预先设定的终点。对文献中记录的与 HCV 复发和分配治疗相关的所有因素进行评估,以达到 4 期和 HVPG≥10mmHg。未发现组间有显著的术前、围手术期或术后差异,包括两组活检的频率。在平均 53.5 个月的随访中,9 例单药治疗患者和 6 例三联治疗患者死亡,5 例单药治疗患者和 4 例三联治疗患者接受了再次移植。17 例单药治疗患者和 10 例三联治疗患者达到 4 期纤维化(P = 0.04),三联治疗患者的纤维化进展较慢(P = 0.048)。分配的治疗和组织学急性肝炎与 4 期纤维化独立相关。与三联治疗患者相比,单药治疗患者的 HVPG 更快地增加到≥10mmHg(P = 0.038)。总之,与单独使用他克莫司相比,在丙型肝炎肝硬化受者中使用硫唑嘌呤进行长期维持免疫抑制和短期泼尼松龙联合他克莫司治疗,导致组织学证实的严重纤维化和门静脉高压的发病时间更晚,这与影响纤维化的已知因素无关。