• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Barriers and opportunities for recruitment for nonintervention studies on HIV risk: perspectives of street drug users.招募非干预性 HIV 风险研究的障碍和机会:街头吸毒者的观点。
Subst Use Misuse. 2009;44(11):1642-59. doi: 10.1080/10826080802543671.
2
Enhancing HIV vaccine trial consent preparedness among street drug users.提高街头吸毒者对艾滋病毒疫苗试验的同意准备程度。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Jun;5(2):65-80. doi: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.2.65.
3
Streets, drugs, and the economy of sex in the age of AIDS.艾滋病时代的街道、毒品与性经济
Women Health. 1998;27(1-2):205-29. doi: 10.1300/J013v27n01_13.
4
Addiction research ethics and the Belmont principles: do drug users have a different moral voice?成瘾研究伦理与贝尔蒙原则:吸毒者有不同的道德声音吗?
Subst Use Misuse. 2011;46(6):728-41. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2010.528125. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
5
A qualitative analysis of peer recruitment pressures in respondent driven sampling: Are risks above the ethical limit?应答者驱动抽样中同伴招募压力的定性分析:风险是否超出伦理限度?
Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Sep;26(9):832-42. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.05.027. Epub 2015 Jun 7.
6
Attitudes toward and beliefs about prenatal HIV testing policies and mandatory HIV testing of newborns among drug users.
AIDS Public Policy J. 2005 Fall-Winter;20(3-4):74-91.
7
Assessing the geographic coverage and spatial clustering of illicit drug users recruited through respondent-driven sampling in New York City.评估通过应答驱动抽样在纽约市招募的非法药物使用者的地理覆盖范围和空间聚集情况。
J Urban Health. 2015 Apr;92(2):352-78. doi: 10.1007/s11524-015-9937-4.
8
Condom use with primary partners among injecting drug users in Bangkok, Thailand and New York City, United States.泰国曼谷和美国纽约市注射吸毒者与主要性伴侣使用避孕套的情况。
AIDS. 1993 Jun;7(6):887-91. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199306000-00020.
9
Knowledge, Stereotyped Beliefs and Attitudes Around HIV Chemoprophylaxis in Two High HIV Prevalence Neighborhoods in New York City.纽约市两个艾滋病病毒高流行社区关于艾滋病病毒化学预防的知识、刻板观念和态度
AIDS Behav. 2017 May;21(5):1247-1255. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1426-6.
10
Risk behavior and HIV infection among new drug injectors in the era of AIDS in New York City.纽约市艾滋病时代新吸毒注射者中的风险行为与艾滋病毒感染
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1999 Jan 1;20(1):67-72. doi: 10.1097/00042560-199901010-00010.

引用本文的文献

1
Correction: Rapid Assessment Amid an Injection Drug Use-Driven HIV Outbreak in Massachusetts' Merrimack Valley: Highlights from a Case Study.更正:马萨诸塞州梅里马克河谷注射吸毒引发的艾滋病毒疫情期间的快速评估:案例研究要点
AIDS Behav. 2025 Feb;29(2):584-588. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04567-w.
2
Rapid Assessment Amid an Injection Drug Use-Driven HIV Outbreak in Massachusetts' Merrimack Valley: Highlights from a Case Study.马萨诸塞州梅里马克河谷注射吸毒引发的艾滋病毒疫情期间的快速评估:一项案例研究的要点
AIDS Behav. 2025 Feb;29(2):562-583. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04540-7. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
3
Peer-based Retention Of people who Use Drugs in Rural Research (PROUD-R): a multisite, randomised, 12-month trial to compare efficacy of standard versus peer-based approaches to retain rural people who use drugs in research.基于同伴的农村地区吸毒者保留研究(PROUD-R):一项多中心、随机、12 个月的试验,旨在比较标准方法与基于同伴的方法在保留农村地区吸毒者参与研究方面的疗效。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 15;12(6):e064400. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064400.
4
A cross-sectional survey of potential factors, motivations, and barriers influencing research participation and retention among people who use drugs in the rural USA.一项横断面调查研究了美国农村地区吸毒人群参与和保留研究的潜在因素、动机和障碍。
Trials. 2021 Dec 20;22(1):948. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05919-w.
5
"Money Helps": People who inject drugs and their perceptions of financial compensation and its ethical implications.“金钱起作用”:注射吸毒者及其对经济补偿及其伦理影响的看法
Ethics Behav. 2019;29(8):607-620. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2018.1535976. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
6
Challenges to Studying Illicit Drug Users.研究非法药物使用者面临的挑战。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2019 Jul;51(4):480-488. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12486. Epub 2019 May 20.
7
Perceived Risks and Benefits in IPV and HIV Research: Listening to the Voices of HIV-Positive African American Women.亲密伴侣暴力与艾滋病毒研究中的感知风险和益处:倾听感染艾滋病毒的非裔美国女性的声音。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Dec;13(5):511-524. doi: 10.1177/1556264618797557. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
8
Enhancing the Responsible Conduct of Sexual Health Prevention Research Across Global and Local Contexts: Training for Evidence-Based Research Ethics.加强全球和地方背景下性健康预防研究的负责任开展:循证研究伦理培训
Ethics Behav. 2015;25(2):87-96. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2014.948956. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
9
Research participation, trust, and fair compensation among people living with and without HIV in Florida.佛罗里达州艾滋病毒感染者和未感染者的研究参与、信任及公平补偿情况。
AIDS Care. 2018 Jan;30(1):27-31. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2017.1338656. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
10
Potential Risks of Ecological Momentary Assessment Among Persons Who Inject Drugs.注射吸毒者中生态瞬时评估的潜在风险。
Subst Use Misuse. 2017 Jun 7;52(7):840-847. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2016.1264969. Epub 2017 Feb 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Marginalized populations and drug addiction research: realism, mistrust, and misconception.边缘化人群与药物成瘾研究:现实、不信任与误解
IRB. 2008 May-Jun;30(3):1-9.
2
Research benefits for hypothetical HIV vaccine trials: The views of Ugandans in the Rakai District.假设性艾滋病毒疫苗试验的研究益处:拉克伊区乌干达人的观点
IRB. 2008 Mar-Apr;30(2):1-7.
3
"They got their program, and I got mine": a cautionary tale concerning the ethical implications of using respondent-driven sampling to study injection drug users.“他们有他们的方案,而我有我的”:一个关于使用应答驱动抽样法研究注射吸毒者的伦理影响的警示故事。
Int J Drug Policy. 2008 Feb;19(1):42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.11.014. Epub 2008 Jan 15.
4
Sampling and recruitment in multilevel studies among marginalized urban populations: the IMPACT studies.边缘化城市人口多层次研究中的抽样与招募:IMPACT研究
J Urban Health. 2008 Mar;85(2):268-80. doi: 10.1007/s11524-008-9256-0. Epub 2008 Jan 24.
5
Positive and negative aspects of participation in illicit drug research: implications for recruitment and ethical conduct.参与非法药物研究的积极与消极方面:对招募及道德行为的影响
Int J Drug Policy. 2007 May;18(3):235-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2006.07.001. Epub 2006 Sep 5.
6
Perceptions of financial payment for research participation among African-American drug users in HIV studies.在艾滋病病毒研究中,非裔美国吸毒者对参与研究的经济报酬的看法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Oct;22(10):1403-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0319-9. Epub 2007 Aug 1.
7
American Indian women, HIV/AIDS, and health disparity.美国印第安女性、艾滋病毒/艾滋病与健康差距。
Subst Use Misuse. 2007;42(4):741-52. doi: 10.1080/10826080701202569.
8
Addiction and sexually transmitted disease (STD), human immunodeficiency virus, (HIV), and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS): their mutual interactions.成瘾与性传播疾病(STD)、人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)及获得性免疫缺陷综合征(AIDS):它们之间的相互作用。
Subst Use Misuse. 2006;41(10-12):1337-48. doi: 10.1080/10826080600837978.
9
Engagement, reciprocity and advocacy: ethical harm reduction practice in research with injecting drug users.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2006 Sep;25(5):419-23. doi: 10.1080/09595230600876606.
10
Australian resources for ethical participatory processes in public health research.澳大利亚公共卫生研究中道德参与式过程的资源。
J Med Ethics. 2006 Mar;32(3):186. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.013243.

招募非干预性 HIV 风险研究的障碍和机会:街头吸毒者的观点。

Barriers and opportunities for recruitment for nonintervention studies on HIV risk: perspectives of street drug users.

机构信息

Center for Ethics Education, Fordham University, Bronx, New York 10458, USA.

出版信息

Subst Use Misuse. 2009;44(11):1642-59. doi: 10.1080/10826080802543671.

DOI:10.1080/10826080802543671
PMID:19938935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3638737/
Abstract

This study used focus-group discussions in response to a video vignette to examine attitudes toward recruitment for nonintervention research involving HIV testing. Participants were 100 ethnically diverse, economically disadvantaged urban drug users, who were recruited from New York City and Hartford, Connecticut in the spring and summer of 2006. Content analyses revealed themes including (1) fears of stigma and legal trouble balanced by trustworthiness of the recruiter; (2) fears of learning one's HIV status balanced by prospects for health benefits, and (3) the right to receive fair monetary compensation balanced by risks of coercion during periods of cravings. Limitations and implications for recruitment practices have been discussed here.

摘要

本研究采用焦点小组讨论的方式,针对一段视频片段,调查了人们对涉及 HIV 检测的非干预性研究招募的态度。参与者是 100 名来自纽约市和康涅狄格州哈特福德市的、种族多样、经济贫困的城市吸毒者,他们是在 2006 年春季和夏季招募的。内容分析揭示了以下主题:(1)对污名化和法律麻烦的恐惧与对招募者的信任相平衡;(2)对了解自己 HIV 状况的恐惧与对健康益处的期望相平衡;(3)接受公平货币补偿的权利与在渴望时期受到胁迫的风险相平衡。这里讨论了招募实践的局限性和意义。