Department of Urban Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Waste Manag Res. 2010 Jan;28(1):76-93. doi: 10.1177/0734242X09349417. Epub 2009 Nov 26.
Despite some progress, municipal solid waste (MSW) still poses pressure on cities and remains one of the major challenges in environmental management. There is no single solution to the problem since the drivers behind MSW systems may vary significantly from city to city. In this context, the development of a common strategy to attain a sustainable management has been increasingly difficult. This paper presents an issue-driven analytical framework to evaluate the past, present and future MSW management strategy for the cities of Yokohama and Boston considering four driver categories while evaluating if the relevance of these drivers has changed over time. These categories represent: (i) legal drivers (e.g. laws and regulations); (ii) technology development and institutional drivers (e.g. available technologies); (iii) regional and international drivers (e.g. solid waste flow as recyclable resources); and (iv) socio-economic drivers (e.g. population trends and public awareness). The analysis indicated that solid waste management capacity for both cases was under stress due to different reasons. In the case of Boston, the moratorium for disposal facilities played an important role while increasing population was a key driver for the city of Yokohama. The future management scenario suggests that various waste-to-energy alternatives and strong solid waste reduction policies will play a key role for Boston. In Yokohama, a shift on waste composition and generation triggered by a demographic change may open the path for new technologies while also considering the international demand of solid waste as a recyclable resource.
尽管取得了一些进展,但城市固体废物 (MSW) 仍然给城市带来压力,仍是环境管理的主要挑战之一。由于推动城市 MSW 系统的驱动力可能存在显著差异,因此,这个问题没有单一的解决方案。在这种情况下,制定实现可持续管理的共同战略越来越困难。本文提出了一个问题驱动的分析框架,以评估横滨和波士顿这两个城市过去、现在和未来的城市固体废物管理策略,同时考虑了四个驱动因素类别,评估这些驱动因素的相关性是否随时间发生了变化。这些类别包括:(i)法律驱动因素(例如法律和法规);(ii)技术发展和制度驱动因素(例如可用技术);(iii)区域和国际驱动因素(例如作为可回收资源的固体废物流动);和(iv)社会经济驱动因素(例如人口趋势和公众意识)。分析表明,由于不同的原因,这两个案例的固体废物管理能力都面临压力。在波士顿的案例中,处置设施的暂停使用发挥了重要作用,而人口增长是横滨市的主要驱动因素。未来的管理情景表明,各种废物转化为能源的替代方案和强有力的固体废物减排政策将为波士顿发挥关键作用。在横滨,人口结构变化引发的废物成分和产生的变化可能为新技术开辟道路,同时也考虑到国际上对固体废物作为可回收资源的需求。