• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过患者参与护士主导的心血管风险管理来改善生活方式和风险认知:初级保健中的一项集群随机对照试验。

Improving lifestyle and risk perception through patient involvement in nurse-led cardiovascular risk management: a cluster-randomized controlled trial in primary care.

机构信息

Maastricht University, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Department of General Practice, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2010 Jan-Feb;50(1-2):35-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.11.007. Epub 2009 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.11.007
PMID:19944713
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if lifestyle improved at a short term through an intervention to involve patients in cardiovascular risk management by the practice nurse.

METHODS

The IMPALA study (2006, the Netherlands) was a cluster-randomised controlled trial involving 25 general practices and 615 patients who were eligible for cardiovascular risk management. The intervention consisted of (1) individual 10-year cardiovascular risk assessment, (2) risk communication, (3) use of a decision aid and (4) adapted motivational interviewing, applied by practice nurses in two consultations. Outcomes were smoking, alcohol, diet, physical activity and the secondary outcomes risk perception, anxiety, confidence about the decision and satisfaction with the communication, measured at baseline and after 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Patients of both groups improved their lifestyle, but no relevant significant differences between the groups were found. Intervention group patients improved in terms of the appropriateness of risk perception, although not significantly. Intervention group patients improved significantly in terms of appropriateness of anxiety and were more satisfied with the communication compared to control group patients.

CONCLUSION

The intervention seems to have improved the patients' risk perception, anxiety and satisfaction with the communication, which are important conditions for shared decision making. However, we found no additional effect of the intervention on lifestyle.

摘要

目的

通过实践护士参与心血管风险管理的干预措施,确定短期生活方式是否有所改善。

方法

IMPALA 研究(2006 年,荷兰)是一项涉及 25 家普通诊所和 615 名符合心血管风险管理条件的患者的集群随机对照试验。干预措施包括:(1)个人 10 年心血管风险评估;(2)风险沟通;(3)使用决策辅助工具;(4)由实践护士在两次咨询中应用适应性动机访谈。在基线和 12 周后测量吸烟、饮酒、饮食、体育活动和次要结局风险感知、焦虑、对决策的信心和对沟通的满意度。

结果

两组患者的生活方式都有所改善,但组间没有发现相关的显著差异。干预组患者在风险感知的适当性方面有所改善,尽管不显著。与对照组患者相比,干预组患者在焦虑的适当性方面有显著改善,并且对沟通的满意度更高。

结论

该干预措施似乎改善了患者的风险感知、焦虑和对沟通的满意度,这是共同决策的重要条件。然而,我们没有发现干预对生活方式的额外影响。

相似文献

1
Improving lifestyle and risk perception through patient involvement in nurse-led cardiovascular risk management: a cluster-randomized controlled trial in primary care.通过患者参与护士主导的心血管风险管理来改善生活方式和风险认知:初级保健中的一项集群随机对照试验。
Prev Med. 2010 Jan-Feb;50(1-2):35-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.11.007. Epub 2009 Nov 26.
2
Improving cardiovascular risk management: a randomized, controlled trial on the effect of a decision support tool for patients and physicians.改善心血管疾病风险管理:一项关于患者和医生决策支持工具效果的随机对照试验。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007 Feb;14(1):44-50. doi: 10.1097/01.hjr.0000239475.71805.1e.
3
The effects of a shared decision-making intervention in primary care of depression: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.共同决策干预对抑郁症初级护理的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Aug;67(3):324-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.03.023. Epub 2007 May 16.
4
Patients' responsiveness to a decision support tool for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in primary care.患者对基层医疗中心血管疾病一级预防决策支持工具的反应性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Jul;72(1):63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.02.009. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
5
[Cardiovascular risk reduction: impact of an international project].[心血管风险降低:一个国际项目的影响]
Ann Ig. 2008 May-Jun;20(3 Suppl 1):43-8.
6
Improving patient adherence to lifestyle advice (IMPALA): a cluster-randomised controlled trial on the implementation of a nurse-led intervention for cardiovascular risk management in primary care (protocol).改善患者对生活方式建议的依从性(IMPALA):一项关于在初级保健中实施护士主导的心血管风险管理干预措施的整群随机对照试验(方案)
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Jan 14;8:9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-9.
7
Effects of a general practice-based intervention on diet, body mass index and blood lipids in patients at cardiovascular risk.一项基于全科医疗的干预措施对心血管疾病风险患者饮食、体重指数和血脂的影响。
J Cardiovasc Risk. 2003 Feb;10(1):31-40. doi: 10.1097/01.hjr.0000050718.61003.30.
8
A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing a health-related lifestyle self-management intervention with standard cardiac rehabilitation following an acute cardiac event: Implications for a larger clinical trial.一项针对急性心脏事件后将健康相关生活方式自我管理干预与标准心脏康复进行比较的试点随机对照试验:对更大规模临床试验的启示。
Aust Crit Care. 2009 Feb;22(1):17-27. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2008.10.003. Epub 2008 Dec 9.
9
Adherence to a guideline on cardiovascular prevention: a comparison between general practitioners and practice nurses.遵循心血管预防指南:全科医生与执业护士的比较。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Jul;48(7):798-807. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.11.008. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
10
[The PreFord Study. A prospective cohort study to evaluate the risk of a cardiovascular event (overall-collective) as well as a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicentre clinical intervention study (high-risk-collective) on primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in the Ford Motor Company employees in Germany].[普瑞福特研究。一项评估心血管事件风险(总体人群)的前瞻性队列研究,以及一项针对德国福特汽车公司员工心血管疾病一级预防的前瞻性、随机、对照、多中心临床干预研究(高危人群)]
Z Kardiol. 2004 Feb;93(2):131-6. doi: 10.1007/s00392-004-0990-3.

引用本文的文献

1
How do health shocks affect preventive behaviours? An empirical examination of the mediating role of perceived risk from a longitudinal study in China.健康冲击如何影响预防行为?来自中国一项纵向研究的关于感知风险中介作用的实证检验。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 26;15(6):e092074. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092074.
2
Effectiveness of behavioural interventions with motivational interviewing on physical activity outcomes in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis.行为干预结合动机式访谈对成年人身体活动效果的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2024 Jul 10;386:e078713. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078713.
3
Effects of message framing and risk perception on health communication for optimum cardiovascular disease primary prevention: a protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled study.
信息框架和风险感知对最佳心血管疾病一级预防的健康传播效果:一项多中心随机对照研究方案。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 14;12:1308745. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1308745. eCollection 2024.
4
Shared Decision-Making in Cardiovascular Risk Factor Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.共享决策在心血管危险因素管理中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e243779. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3779.
5
Implementing decision aids for cardiovascular disease prevention: stakeholder interviews and case studies in Australian primary care.实施心血管疾病预防决策辅助工具:澳大利亚初级保健中的利益相关者访谈和案例研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Feb 3;25(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02258-4.
6
Cardiovascular disease risk communication and prevention: a meta-analysis.心血管疾病风险沟通与预防:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2024 Mar 27;45(12):998-1013. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae002.
7
Secondary prevention by structured semi-interactive stroke prevention package in INDIA (SPRINT INDIA): Findings from the process evaluation of a randomized controlled trial.结构化半互动卒中预防包在印度的二级预防(SPRINT INDIA):一项随机对照试验的过程评估结果。
Eur Stroke J. 2023 Dec;8(4):1053-1063. doi: 10.1177/23969873231192291. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
8
Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases in Community Settings and Primary Health Care: A Pre-Implementation Contextual Analysis Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.社区环境和初级卫生保健中的心血管疾病预防:使用实施研究综合框架进行的预实施情境分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 11;19(14):8467. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148467.
9
Promoting physical activity in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在初级保健中促进身体活动:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Apr 29;71(706):e399-e405. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.0817. Print 2021 May.
10
Effectiveness of an Intervention Aimed at Improving Information for Patients with High Cardiovascular Risk: INFORISK Clinical Trial.旨在改善高心血管风险患者信息的干预措施的效果:INFORISK 临床试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 31;18(7):3621. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073621.