• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经颈动脉保护装置支架置入术中的颈动脉入路:减少脑栓塞的有效工具。

Cervical access for filter-protected carotid artery stenting: a useful tool to reduce cerebral embolisation.

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Sant'Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University of Rome (Second Medical School), Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Mar;39(3):252-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.11.011. Epub 2009 Nov 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.11.011
PMID:19945315
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Filter-protected transcervical carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been suggested to reduce the intraoperative cerebral embolisation observed during transfemoral CAS. We therefore evaluated clinical outcome and incidence of ischaemic lesions at diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) after transcervical and transfemoral CAS.

METHODS

From March 2007 to May 2009, we performed filter-protected CAS in 135 patients with symptomatic (30%) or asymptomatic (70%) carotid stenosis above 70% and below 95%. In 44 patients with risky femoral access or unfavourable aortic arch anatomy, access to common carotid artery was achieved by a small cervical incision. In another 91 procedures we used a classic percutaneous femoral access. Preoperative and postoperative DW-MRI scans were obtained after 111 procedures (82%) - 35 transcervical and 76 transfemoral.

RESULTS

The incidence of clinical events (transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and stroke) was 2.3% after transcervical CAS and 19.8% after transfemoral CAS (P<0.01), without any deaths. DW-MRI disclosed new ischaemic lesions in five patients (5/35, 14.3%) after transcervical CAS and in 28 patients (28/76, 36.8%) after transfemoral CAS (P=0.015). All ischaemic lesions depicted after transcervical procedures were ipsilateral to the treated artery.

CONCLUSIONS

Transcervical filter-protected CAS, compared with classic percutaneous procedures, seems to reduce clinical events and DW-MRI ischaemic damage and may be useful in selected patients.

摘要

背景

滤器保护经颈内动脉颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)已被证明可减少经股动脉 CAS 术中观察到的术中脑栓塞。因此,我们评估了经颈内和经股动脉 CAS 后的临床结果和弥散加权磁共振成像(DW-MRI)上缺血性病变的发生率。

方法

从 2007 年 3 月到 2009 年 5 月,我们对 135 例症状性(30%)或无症状性(70%)颈动脉狭窄超过 70%但低于 95%的患者进行了滤器保护 CAS。在 44 例股动脉入路风险大或主动脉弓解剖结构不佳的患者中,通过小的颈部切口进入颈总动脉。在另外 91 例手术中,我们使用了经典的经皮股动脉入路。在 111 例(82%)手术中获得了术前和术后 DW-MRI 扫描-35 例经颈内和 76 例经股。

结果

经颈内 CAS 后临床事件(短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)和中风)的发生率为 2.3%,经股 CAS 后为 19.8%(P<0.01),无死亡。DW-MRI 显示 5 例(5/35,14.3%)经颈内 CAS 后和 28 例(28/76,36.8%)经股 CAS 后出现新的缺血性病变(P=0.015)。经颈内手术后出现的所有缺血性病变均与治疗的动脉同侧。

结论

与经典的经皮手术相比,经颈内滤器保护 CAS 似乎可降低临床事件和 DW-MRI 缺血性损伤的发生率,并且可能对某些患者有用。

相似文献

1
Cervical access for filter-protected carotid artery stenting: a useful tool to reduce cerebral embolisation.经颈动脉保护装置支架置入术中的颈动脉入路:减少脑栓塞的有效工具。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Mar;39(3):252-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.11.011. Epub 2009 Nov 27.
2
Cerebral embolization during transcervical carotid stenting with flow reversal: a diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance study.经颈颈动脉支架置入术中血流逆转时的脑栓塞:一项扩散加权磁共振研究
Ann Vasc Surg. 2009 Jul-Aug;23(4):429-35. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.09.009. Epub 2008 Nov 28.
3
A diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging-based study of transcervical carotid stenting with flow reversal versus transfemoral filter protection.基于扩散加权磁共振成像的经颈内颈动脉支架置入术与经股动脉滤器保护的血流逆转研究。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Dec;56(6):1585-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.05.107. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
4
Safety and feasibility of a novel transcervical access neuroprotection system for carotid artery stenting in the PROOF Study.在 PROOF 研究中,新型经颈入路神经保护系统在颈动脉支架置入术中的安全性和可行性。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1317-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.04.040. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
5
A prospective evaluation of cerebral infarction following transcervical carotid stenting with carotid flow reversal.经颈内颈动脉支架置入术联合颈动脉血流反转治疗后脑梗死的前瞻性评估。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Jun;39(6):661-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.02.006. Epub 2010 Mar 19.
6
Filter-protected versus unprotected carotid artery stenting: a randomised trial.滤器保护与无保护颈动脉支架置入术的随机试验。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010 Feb;29(3):282-9. doi: 10.1159/000275505. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
7
Randomized clinical trial of open-cell vs closed-cell stents for carotid stenting and effects of stent design on cerebral embolization.随机临床试验:开环支架与闭环支架在颈动脉支架置入术中的应用比较,以及支架设计对脑栓塞的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1310-1316.e1; discussion 1316. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.05.013. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
8
Embolism to the brain during carotid stenting and surgery.颈动脉支架置入术和手术过程中发生的脑栓塞。
Acta Chir Belg. 2007 Mar-Apr;107(2):151-4.
9
Cerebral embolization in asymptomatic versus symptomatic patients after carotid stenting.无症状与有症状颈动脉支架置入术后患者的脑栓塞。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Dec;56(6):1579-84; discussion 1584. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.06.074. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
10
Results of carotid artery stenting with transcervical access.经颈动脉入路颈动脉支架置入术的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Nov;58(5):1402-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.07.111. Epub 2013 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcervical approach for carotid artery stenting without flow reversal: A case report.经颈入路无血流逆转的颈动脉支架置入术:一例报告。
Radiol Case Rep. 2022 Aug 28;17(11):4115-4119. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.08.004. eCollection 2022 Nov.
2
European Stroke Organisation guideline on endarterectomy and stenting for carotid artery stenosis.欧洲卒中组织关于颈动脉狭窄内膜切除术和支架置入术的指南。
Eur Stroke J. 2021 Jun;6(2):I-XLVII. doi: 10.1177/23969873211012121. Epub 2021 May 11.
3
Silent brain infarcts on diffusion-weighted imaging after carotid revascularisation: A surrogate outcome measure for procedural stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
颈动脉血运重建术后扩散加权成像上的无症状脑梗死:程序性卒中的替代结局指标?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Stroke J. 2019 Jun;4(2):127-143. doi: 10.1177/2396987318824491. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
4
Immediate and Delayed Procedural Stroke or Death in Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis.支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗症状性颈动脉狭窄的即刻和延迟操作相关卒中或死亡。
Stroke. 2018 Nov;49(11):2715-2722. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020684.