• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 PROOF 研究中,新型经颈入路神经保护系统在颈动脉支架置入术中的安全性和可行性。

Safety and feasibility of a novel transcervical access neuroprotection system for carotid artery stenting in the PROOF Study.

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Augusta Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1317-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.04.040. Epub 2011 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2011.04.040
PMID:21658889
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials have shown that periprocedural rates of stroke and death are higher with carotid artery stenting (CAS) than with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in the treatment of carotid artery stenosis. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) has shown higher rates of clinically silent new ischemic brain lesions when CAS is performed as compared with CEA. The Silk Road Medical Embolic PROtectiOn System: First-In-Man (PROOF) Study is a single-arm first-in-man study using the MICHI Neuroprotection System (Silk Road Medical Inc, Sunnyvale, Calif), a novel transcervical access and cerebral embolic protection system. This system enables stent implantation under controlled blood flow reversal of the carotid artery, also known as Flow Altered Short Transcervical Carotid Artery Stenting (FAST-CAS).

METHODS

Between March 2009 and February 2010, a total of 44 subjects were enrolled into the study. The primary composite endpoint was major stroke, myocardial infarction, or death within 30 days. Forty-three patients (97.7%) completed the study through the 30-day endpoint. One patient was lost to follow-up. In a subgroup of consecutive subjects, DW-MRI examinations were performed preprocedure and within 24 to 48 hours after the stent implantation. Blinded independent neuroradiologists reviewed all DW-MRI studies and confirmed the absence or presence of new ischemic brain lesions.

RESULTS

All enrolled patients were successfully treated, and no major adverse events were seen through the follow-up period. Thirty-one subjects had DW-MRI examinations. Of these, five patients (16%) had evidence of new ischemic brain lesions but no clinical sequelae. Transient intolerance to reverse flow was reported in 9% of cases, but in all cases, a stent was successfully placed, and the intolerance was managed by minimizing the duration of reverse flow during the procedure.

CONCLUSION

In this first-in-man experience, FAST-CAS using the MICHI Neuroprotection System was shown to be a safe and feasible method for carotid revascularization. DW-MRI findings suggest controlled reverse flow provides cerebral embolic protection similar to that seen with CEA.

摘要

背景

随机对照试验表明,在治疗颈动脉狭窄时,颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)的围手术期卒中率和死亡率高于颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)。与 CEA 相比,CAS 时弥散加权磁共振成像(DW-MRI)显示出更高的临床无症状新缺血性脑病变发生率。丝绸之路医疗栓塞 PROtectiOn 系统:首例人体(PROOF)研究是一项使用 MICHI 神经保护系统(Silk Road Medical Inc,加利福尼亚州森尼韦尔)的单臂首例人体研究,这是一种新型经颈入路和脑栓塞保护系统。该系统允许在颈动脉血流逆转的控制下植入支架,也称为血流改变的短经颈颈动脉支架置入术(FAST-CAS)。

方法

2009 年 3 月至 2010 年 2 月,共纳入 44 例患者。主要复合终点为 30 天内发生重大卒中、心肌梗死或死亡。43 例患者(97.7%)完成了 30 天的研究。1 例患者失访。在连续患者的亚组中,术前和支架置入后 24 至 48 小时进行 DW-MRI 检查。盲法独立神经放射学家审查了所有 DW-MRI 研究,并确认有无新的缺血性脑病变。

结果

所有入组患者均成功治疗,随访期间无重大不良事件发生。31 例患者进行了 DW-MRI 检查。其中,5 例(16%)有新的缺血性脑病变证据,但无临床后遗症。9%的病例报告短暂不耐受逆行血流,但在所有病例中,支架均成功放置,并通过在手术过程中尽量减少逆行血流的持续时间来管理不耐受。

结论

在这项首例人体经验中,使用 MICHI 神经保护系统的 FAST-CAS 被证明是一种安全可行的颈动脉血运重建方法。DW-MRI 结果表明,控制逆行血流可提供与 CEA 相似的脑栓塞保护。

相似文献

1
Safety and feasibility of a novel transcervical access neuroprotection system for carotid artery stenting in the PROOF Study.在 PROOF 研究中,新型经颈入路神经保护系统在颈动脉支架置入术中的安全性和可行性。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1317-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.04.040. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
2
A diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging-based study of transcervical carotid stenting with flow reversal versus transfemoral filter protection.基于扩散加权磁共振成像的经颈内颈动脉支架置入术与经股动脉滤器保护的血流逆转研究。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Dec;56(6):1585-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.05.107. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
3
Randomized clinical trial of open-cell vs closed-cell stents for carotid stenting and effects of stent design on cerebral embolization.随机临床试验:开环支架与闭环支架在颈动脉支架置入术中的应用比较,以及支架设计对脑栓塞的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1310-1316.e1; discussion 1316. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.05.013. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
4
Cerebral embolization during transcervical carotid stenting with flow reversal: a diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance study.经颈颈动脉支架置入术中血流逆转时的脑栓塞:一项扩散加权磁共振研究
Ann Vasc Surg. 2009 Jul-Aug;23(4):429-35. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.09.009. Epub 2008 Nov 28.
5
Risk factors for cerebral embolization after carotid artery stenting with embolic protection: a diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging study in 837 consecutive patients.颈动脉支架置入术联合栓子保护装置后发生脑栓塞的危险因素:837 例连续患者的弥散加权磁共振成像研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jun;6(3):311-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.000093. Epub 2013 May 28.
6
Randomized comparison of distal and proximal cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting.随机比较颈动脉支架置入术时远端和近端脑保护。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov;6(11):1203-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.006.
7
A prospective evaluation of cerebral infarction following transcervical carotid stenting with carotid flow reversal.经颈内颈动脉支架置入术联合颈动脉血流反转治疗后脑梗死的前瞻性评估。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Jun;39(6):661-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.02.006. Epub 2010 Mar 19.
8
Cervical access for filter-protected carotid artery stenting: a useful tool to reduce cerebral embolisation.经颈动脉保护装置支架置入术中的颈动脉入路:减少脑栓塞的有效工具。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Mar;39(3):252-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.11.011. Epub 2009 Nov 27.
9
Impact of asymptomatic cerebral lesions in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging after carotid artery stenting.颈动脉支架置入术后弥散加权磁共振成像无症状性脑病变的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Apr;6(4):394-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.019. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
10
Silent stroke and cognitive decline in asymptomatic carotid stenosis revascularization.无症状性颈动脉狭窄血管重建术中的无症状性卒中与认知功能减退
Vascular. 2012 Aug;20(4):181-7. doi: 10.1258/vasc.2011.oa0342. Epub 2012 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal Cerebral Protection Confirmed by Transcranial Doppler During Transcarotid Artery Revascularization.经颈动脉血管重建术中经颅多普勒证实的最佳脑保护
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2024 Dec 26;20(1):106-112. doi: 10.14797/mdcvj.1465. eCollection 2024.
2
The intracranial effects of flow reversal during transcarotid artery revascularization.经颈动脉血管重建术中血流逆转的颅内影响。
Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2024 Apr 30;32(2):123-131. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2024.25700. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Transcarotid artery revascularization in blunt carotid injury.
钝性颈动脉损伤的经颈动脉血管重建术
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2022 Dec 5;9(2):101073. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2022.10.021. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Quantification of new intracerebral lesions on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging after transcarotid artery revascularization for treatment of carotid artery stenosis.经颈动脉血管重建术治疗颈动脉狭窄后,通过扩散加权磁共振成像对新的脑内病变进行定量分析。
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2023 Jan 14;9(1):101102. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101102. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Analysis of the anatomic eligibility for transcarotid artery revascularization in Chinese patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy and transfemoral carotid artery stenting.对接受颈动脉内膜切除术和经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术的中国患者进行经颈动脉血管重建术的解剖学适宜性分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 6;9:1045598. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1045598. eCollection 2022.
6
Transcervical approach for carotid artery stenting without flow reversal: A case report.经颈入路无血流逆转的颈动脉支架置入术:一例报告。
Radiol Case Rep. 2022 Aug 28;17(11):4115-4119. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.08.004. eCollection 2022 Nov.
7
Outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization: A systematic review.经颈动脉血运重建术的结果:一项系统性综述。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Jun;30(3):396-403. doi: 10.1177/15910199221123283. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
8
The Efficacy of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization With Flow Reversal System Compared to Carotid Endarterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.与颈动脉内膜切除术相比,使用血流逆转系统的经颈动脉血管重建术的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Nov 19;8:695295. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.695295. eCollection 2021.
9
European Stroke Organisation guideline on endarterectomy and stenting for carotid artery stenosis.欧洲卒中组织关于颈动脉狭窄内膜切除术和支架置入术的指南。
Eur Stroke J. 2021 Jun;6(2):I-XLVII. doi: 10.1177/23969873211012121. Epub 2021 May 11.
10
Intravascular lithotripsy during transcarotid arterial revascularization for highly calcified lesions in high-risk patients.高危患者经颈动脉血管重建术治疗高度钙化病变时的血管内碎石术
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2020 Nov 5;7(1):68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2020.10.018. eCollection 2021 Mar.